this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
583 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33143 readers
2457 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Do you think that animals have consciousness? Do they feel pain, fear? Is it moral for you to inflict pain and fear on a conscious being? What about 1,000,000 of those beings? Would you butcher a toddler for meat? What about an animal with similar (or more) depth of emotion and cognition than that? Is it okay because they are other species? What about the deforestation caused by animal agriculture? What about the impact on climate change? I think there are many valid moral arguments that you are outright dismissing with a mere hand wave. I hope you give it some more thought

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

if you have an argument that it is immoral, make it. i don't care for your interrogative style.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I like to give people questions to ponder and explore. I think my arguments are very clear from the questions I have raised. Suffering of conscious beings is a negative thing. Particularly the egregious conditions in which we raise our "meat". This isn't even considering the horrible conditions that humans suffer working in and around the meat industry.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I like to give people questions to ponder and explore.

if you don't wan to construct an argument that's fine, but the socratic method isn't terribly convincing for me and many others.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You can't appreciate a philosophical argument on a philosophical issue? I suppose that can be valid. It seems to me you don't want to consider the ideas I have raised in good faith

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

i'm willing to consider a fully formed argument. i'm not willing to be pestered by an endless interrogation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (34 children)

Suffering of conscious beings is a negative thing.

can you support this claim?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There's obviously no way to prove this sort of statement, however every conscious being I've asked has told me they don't like suffering. Additionally, almost all conscious beings specifically go out of their way to avoid suffering. I personally find this evidence sufficiently convincing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

but pain in and of itself isn't bad. it can be justified or unjustified.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

We're not simply talking about pain, though. I like the painful sensation from hot peppers, for example, but I wouldn't ever wish to subject myself to the systematic violence and awful conditions that farmed animals face.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

and I wouldn't wish for you to be treated like an animal, either.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Is it moral for you to inflict pain and fear on a conscious being?

i suppose that depends on circumstances.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What about the deforestation caused by animal agriculture?

that's bad. buying beans doesn't fix it though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This is a strawman. No one is arguing buying beans fixes deforestation. However, if less meat is produced (ie less animals are raised for slaughter), then less deforestation will come as a result of the meat industry. If legume farming was destroying the rainforest, I'd have a problem with that too

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If legume farming was destroying the rainforest,

turns out, a lot of the the deforested amazon is being used to grow soy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This was the case, and is certainly problematic. Take it a step further -- who or what is consuming that soy? Animal agriculture, by and large. Therefore this is an argument for veganism, or at least reducing consumption.

https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/victories/amazon-rainforest-deforestation-soy-moratorium-success/

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

the vast majority of the world's soy (about 85%) is pressed for oil in an oil press for human use. the byproduct of the press is called soy meal or soy cake, and would be a waste product if we didn't find a use for it. currently, almost all of it goes to feed livestock, (about 70% of the entire crop-weight).

soybeans are used by people, and we feed the trash to livestock.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

if less meat is produced (ie less animals are raised for slaughter), then less deforestation will come as a result of the meat industry.

but just being vegan doesn't cause this to happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's simple economics. Less demand, less supply.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

that's not causal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

you are outright dismissing with a mere hand wave.

i am not. i have been fighting with vegans, primarily on issues of the environment, for i think 8 or 9 years now. i have heard about every argument (though i'm always excited to find a new one!), and i have not been convinced by any of them that i have a duty to be vegan.