this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
518 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

23988 readers
1391 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 106 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Ubuntu is just Debian with adware

    [–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Are the Ubuntu ads in the room with us right now? The only thing I remember is apt telling you about Ubuntu Pro. At that point Plasma is adware too for advertising their donation page.

    [–] [email protected] 85 points 6 months ago

    remember when Canonical pushed Ads in Unity? That commentator remembers.

    [–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    There was the Amazon thing in the launcher years ago

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    I remember that one. The applet that lead to amazon with their referral code. From what I heard from Alan Pope, it did bring in money, but even the manufacturers they worked with always blurred/removed it from their promotional materials. So it got removed for good.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    Ah yes. Complaining about the minimal version of the distro not being minimal due to a 2.6mb package. Canonical is a true monster.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    You gave a snarky response implying that there aren't ads on Ubuntu and they replied with confirmation from a developer that they'll be forcing ads on ubuntu.

    Are you still arguing that canonical isn't serving ads on Ubuntu? Or are you just being an ass because you were proven wrong?

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    There are no ads on Ubuntu. The terminal reminding you that Pro exists is not an ad. Or do we consider Plasma as having ads now? I read that they will be asking their users to donate once a year.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    Okay, let's compare KDE and Ubuntu, as I understand it.

    From what you said, the terminal reminds you than a Pro version exist, and that you can buy it. => This is a ads, they try to sell their product to you.

    More question for the Ubuntu parts:

    • How often does this happen ? Just once a year ?

    KDE send a notification once a year to say they need donation, help for translation, coding, writing documentation, and more. => This is not a ads, this is a message to get help and donations, and only once a year.


    If you don't see the big difference between the two things, i don't know how to make it more clear with other words.

    I don't use Ubuntu, and if some parts are wrong, I wait for corrections !

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

    I guess you could also ask: "Does the pro-tier give one any options/additional functionality that the non-pro/non-donation tier doesn't?"

    Obviously, if you have to pay for additional functionality (like settings/themes/updates) then it isn't a simple ask for donation. Though, I'd argue to ignore trivialities such as "thank you"-emails and possibly a small visual-only token on the program that you paid/donated, as those barely count as "functionality".

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

    Asking for a donation =/= charging money for security updates

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Saying "you can use Ubuntu pro" is not intrusive at all

    [–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    yeah, messing with apt just to push a service really doesn't sit well. And they don't stop there, snaps are preferred over apt packages in Ubuntu Land.

    [–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

    Snaps suck so much!

    [–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    Do feel it is designed to scare normal users though.

    Like how the GUI software updater now shows a list of security updates, and then “there are more security updates available with Ubuntu pro” in the list of updates…. the obvious implication is “you’re computer has other known vulnerabilities that can only be fixed if you pay up”.

    Liiittlle bit ransomey and let be honest that’s by design.

    Wouldn’t consider myself part of the anti canonical pitchfork crowd but that new behaviour did irk me somewhat.

    If Microsoft did that people would be up in arms. Appreciate canonical provide Ubuntu is free but normal users wouldn’t get that nuance as they don’t think they pay for windows.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Last time I loaded up Ubuntu, considering it for a server, the moment I saw that, I deleted the VM and took it off my list permanently

    I have no interest in that kind of manipulative BS

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

    Yeah, I was not loving how hard they’re going for snaps, but the whole “Ubuntu Pro” bullshit scaremongering just 100% turned me off of the distro.

    [–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

    ubuntu pro is free to just use on one computer

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

    No - and if they left it at that it would be great. I had to clean up 25 devices that had ububtu Lts, and that advantage had enabled the repos for thst shit, so apt wouldnt even do a dist-upgrade to prepare for do-release-upgrade.

    Its not just the OS either, they are cancer to oss with their mixed «community» and enterprise stuff.

    They only ever open source as little as they can.

    Sell services, not code

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

    I see you've got the spirit of this meme

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    In principle yes, as Ubuntu is derived from Debian Sid, but with modifications to make it stable. Thus, the sources they are built from are different and hence, not completely binary compatible, like e.g. *Ubuntu and Mint or Debian and LMDE are. The configuration settings different also here and there and thus, guides for Ubuntu are not 1:1 transferable to Debian and vice versa.