this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

5301 readers
9 users here now

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to take wildlife/outdoor photos recreationally. I don't want to get frustrated by photo quality, but I also don't want to spend more than I need to. That being said I'm willing to consider expensive equipment, but only if it benefits my needs. Does anyone have some canned recommendations?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

What is your budget and would you accept second hand cameras?

Personally I would start with a second hand APS-C camera. APS-C crop cameras will give you an extension on your focal length, and when birding you want long lenses.

Any camera from the last 10 years from Nikon, Canon or Sony will be fine, I would go Nikon or Sony myself but it's your choice. Sony for the quality of the camera, Nikon for the lens range. Canon is fine but the build quality on their bottom end cameras is weak.

New: Nikon Z50 or Sony A6700

Used: Nikon: 3200, 3300, 3400, 3500, 5300, D5500, D5600, D7100, D7200, D7500, D500
Sony: NEX-7, a6000, a6100, a6300, a6400, a6500, a6600

You can find some of the used models new, a feature you might like is in body image stabilisation, but image quality wise they're all close enough that image quality will be more lens dependant than body dependant. Newer/Higher end models have better AF.

then you want a lens, 200mm 2.8 is nice, 300mm is nicer, some sort of stabilisation is useful for you too.

If you like mirrorless sony is good, if you prefer a DSLR used Nikon is good.