this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
399 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72000 readers
5231 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Original Link.

More info.

In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages. At the time of the suit's filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had "been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions". The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing "false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency's reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill".

On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Wikipedia might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site". In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources. Justice Manmohan said "I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes."

On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 51 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This right here. Let's not single out India, there's a lot of shitheel governments to go around.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 8 months ago

The article is about India.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

It's the country named in the article lmao

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Which other countries were subjects of the article?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Article is specifically about India

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

This article is specifically about India, going All Lives Matter just seems strange here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Comparing the censorship of a Wikipedia article to the treatment of black people is shameful. You’re way off base.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm saying you are taking a specific criticism and veering it into a vague criticism. The article is about India so criticism is directed towards India. Saying "it's bad whoever does it" bring nothing to the table.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And you’re taking a vague criticism and trying to make it into something it’s not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The article was specifically about India. So people specifically criticized India. Doesn't seem vague to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You seemed to have trouble understanding what was going on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, I get it. You want to make something more than it is because you enjoy being mad. So, you pick a big topic to compare it to. One that, if it were true, would theoretically make me look bad. Then you double down on it because, again, you like being mad. You want everything to be the way you want it, and you don’t accept that other people have different opinions that are as equally as valid as your own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not sure if copypasta or AI text...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, clearly you have issues comprehending.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's true, I have no idea what you are on about and what your messages have to do with the topic

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yet you feel the need to insert your opinion anyway. Charming.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Do you mean the original topic or what?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Using a baseball allusion when referring to censorship is shameful. You really dropped the ball here.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi