this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
415 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

67422 readers
3491 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
415
OpenAI, Google, Anthropic admit they can’t scale up their chatbots any further (pivot-to-ai.com)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by MajorHavoc@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm usually the one saying "AI is already as good as it's gonna get, for a long while."

This article, in contrast, is quotes from folks making the next AI generation - saying the same.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Though, I don't think that means they won't get any better. It just means they don't scale by feeding in more training data. But that's why OpenAI changed their approach and added some reasoning abilities. And we're developing/researching things like multimodality etc... There's still quite some room for improvements.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago

Though, I don't think that means they won't get any better. It just means they don't scale by feeding in more training data.

Agreed. There's plenty of improvement to be had, but the gravy train of "more CPU or more data == better results" sounds like it's ending.