this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

33281 readers
816 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you took your own advice, you wouldn’t have so many comments of yours deleted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How does being a moderator make one an expert on common decency?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

One need not to be an expert to see that your comments were inappropriate and broke the rules.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You know what's appropriate, the moderator knows what's appropriate, and anybody who disagrees is wrong.

And anybody who asks for an explanation is just trolling.

That's a rather massive and arrogant assumption.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not “anyone”. But certainly you, currently.

You broke the rules, and you got your comments removed. Facing the consequences of your actions is not a state of victimhood.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's rather beside my point. I addressed prosecution without explanation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You’ve been told multiple times where to find your explanation. You didn’t like the answer, and so now you seem to be pretending that you didn’t hear it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I think you might be wrong there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And you refused to answer me when I asked you in what court of law are you being prosecuted? State, federal? What laws are you alleged to have broken?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So, you still can’t answer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Actually it's that I prefer not to answer. It would be like building a house upon a swamp.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Kinda like claiming simple moderator actions on a private forum or are tantamount to “prosecution“