It seems to me more like a game of "chicken" - you wouldn't really vote for the other side, would you? (Immediately votes for other side.) Okay yeah, but you wouldn't like, do exactly that yet again, would you? (Immediately does that again.) Okay yeah, but you wouldn't like, do exactly that still yet also again, would you? (Repeat.)
This is what people miss about conservatives: they seem to be getting things done. When you have a single-minded focus on a particular thing, like abortion, then regardless of whether you should have done so or not you are going to get it done when you put in the level of time and effort that was done.
Never mind that it was a cover for lowering taxes on the wealthy - The People voted for it, and so got both in the same package. In contrast, the Dems seem to stand for... what exactly? Besides being merely less obvious about making payments to corporations?
Survival of the Fittest for now looks like it has doomed the USA Democrats. We'll see if it has doomed democracy itself (this one globally). All I know is that afaik no democracy in history has ever survived devolution into a 2-party system - the parties each merely claim that they are not the other side, which incentives them to avoid actually doing anything themselves, which causes systemic collapse (hrm, sounds familiar somehow...).
I wish I could see a way out of this.
Except they still don't care, and resent you for edumacating them. Whatever you say, they "win". Welcome to the post -information age.
Later: why didn't you do the thing I asked?
The secret is: it's always your fault.
I like to think that he forgets, keeps trying and then makes a new post about it
Spoiler: they won't, but meanwhile Republicans will promise to (BBB lowers taxes on tips and such, thereby incentivizing those styles of employment at the expense of the middle class).