My point is they're NOT only getting incest and very niche things removed.

This GREATLY depends on how one frames their own experiences, which we also do not get much information on from OP's post. If someone is merely seeking validation for their conclusions which they claim their experience points at conclusively, then they are FAR from the scientific method.

In fact, I'd argue the wording does point to such logistic fallacies. They cite their own experiences, not something more removed from subjective experience.

"The obvious issues I deal with..." are BY DEFINITION subjective. This person, and you yourself, are failing to understand the scientific method.

I am fully and wholly believing that basically no one is FULLY self-aware. We can be aware of our follies and wrinkles and foibles all day, but I guarantee you no one has an absolutely correct view of themselves. Ironically, the most self-aware people probably generally have a worse view of themselves than reality for the simple fact that the ones questioning themselves are on the minority side of reality.

In a more literal sense, I guarantee you humans are on the "ignorant" side of reality given that even wave/partical duality is so "unnatural" seeming let alone the concepts of non-locality or what 3+1 dimensions mean...

I think your post could be summed up pretty well by the sensible teachings of stoicism. (as much as those teachings need explanation, so thanks for that): Remove yourself from even the emotions you are experiencing and ask why? "Yes, I feel terrible, but why?" Oh, it's some underlying need for connection that I seem to not be getting, and I'm projecting that need on to this person. Why do I need it? Etc. Etc.

IMO, it's a necessity of being a functioning adult to realize that ones' path diverges from anothers regardless of how we feel about it. Even the most compatible relationships from history don't work out, and that's ok. (hell even the most basic Romeo and Juliet explores that...)

Sometimes even the most "preordained" relationships don't work out, and that's OK and no reason to shit on one's own existence. It's always worth exploring other connections, and those connections definitely do not need to be in romance in the slightest.

I mean... I get what you're getting at with literally copied content, but... come on, this framing of the issue is strictly ridiculous in the most literal sense...

No, you didn't. "No" meant, "no, your presumptive train of thought was incorrect." The rest of the text should've clued you in as to what was meant so long as you properly exclude what was assumed before the "no".

If this is still difficult for you, there are many resources out there to improve reading comprehension.

'I'm sure you hear this kind of thing all the time" ... "NO, ..."

Grapefruit juice. Always and for ever.

(disclaimer: DO NOT take meds with grapefruit juice as it can have a massive effect on how fast your body absorbs the medication...)

... Though I bring it up to point out that the "best" meals will be extremely basic and uncomplicated foods. I'd avoid most things, if it's important meds that need to remain in balance. If it says you do not need to take it on a full stomach, I'd avoid food around such times.

I hope a biologist/biochemist/etc can chime in on what foods are least likely to directly fuck with meds, since as far as I remember, a ton of it is about simply buffering out the meds with filler and digestion time, which a lot of food should fit.

You're doing God's work.

I swear, some people have failed so hard to raise their children that "no" remains a foreign concept in to adulthood... It's so utterly insane. (no I don't assume that over autism/etc usually but in this context?)

I mean, maybe a bad therapist...Which I will fully admit there are A LOT of bad therapists out there.

I'm not. Americans are such insane sheeple it's not even funny in an ironic way... it's just how slavery will be re-institutionalized in the "west". Dumb morons too interested in placation than freedom.

I mean, crypto is still not the answer so long as it is functionally a speculative asset even after all the proof efficiency improvements... Also it still has centralized points which keyholders could easily leverage.