[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

A violent revolution won't solve anything

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

You're living in a historical period idiot

36
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

When I was a youngling, graphics improved quickly and that made older games look worse by every year. What initially looked amazing and "life-like" turned dated in just a couple of years, however it seems graphics has plateaued in the last ten-ish years.

I would say that we reached the point of diminishing returns around next-gen GTA V / MGS V. Not that you can't see the difference between those and modern games, but it's nowhere the leap from San Andreas to GTA IV.

I recently started playing MGS V again and I'm shocked at how good it still looks, compare it to RDD 2 and you would probably need a side by side comparison to see the extra detail.

We have finally reached a point where old games dont get less immersive because our baseline in visual fidelity keeps increasing, or if it does it's atleast a lot slower.

154
Dog (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 168 points 1 month ago

Hey, unused memory is wasted memory

[-] [email protected] 60 points 2 months ago

Context for the foreigners. A man was sleeping in that cabin when the boat drove up on shore. He only woke up after his neighbor came to check on him.

60
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Has started to grind my gears, since there is no way to quickly explain that I'm happy with the current situation (I live in the nordics, not the US). Historically I would be considered a conservative, since I don't see a need to progress (atleast at an accelerated rate). However that term is now used to define reactionaries, which are people who reacting to the changing society wants to regress to a earlier time.

Why must we change the meanings of such obvious words?

54
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

How come there is no real "wacky experimentation" side of the coffee community? The only one I can identify is the "snobby" coffee community (you know the one), and the rest being mostly just a refrained version of that.

Compare that to the homebrewing community, you have the snobbs (the mead community is infamous), but then there are the "prison hoochers", turning anything containing sugar into alcohol.

Where are the mavericks who perform the important societal task of discerning if "is coffee and cheeto-spice a good combo?" and "what happens if you brew coffee with red bull?"

On a more serious note it would be great so more people try different ways to spice coffee, instead of just trying to brew the flatest, "perfect" brew. I've found adding some fruity black tea to my coffee in a French press to work really well.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago

Idk man, the beheadings, crucifictions and other genocide in Ukraine seems quite distasteful too

[-] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago

Americans are better at following the laws of war, but are also more efficient at waging war.

[-] [email protected] 60 points 5 months ago

I know some clients show that, but the culture here is generally quite against the concept. Tends to lead to people being scared of going against the majority and creates a hive mind mentality to keep karma high.

71
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
62
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
63
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

How come there are so few racing games coming out lately? Feels like it's just codemasters doing their thing, some struggling indie games and a truckload of shovelware. I'm not saying it's dead but wasn't racing games one of the primary genres?

Another thing that bugs me with the few games that come out is the lack of progression and immersion. NFS Unbound impressed me slightly with actually starting you out with a low spec car and having slow (by modern standards) progression. However halfway through when you have fast and "cool" cars you really felt the games mediocrity.

Dirt rally 1 and 2 has economy systems, but after a single championship you can basically buy whatever car you want. The rallies are immersive but everything between is just boring menues.

Why do you think the state of racing games is so poor? The industry being shit? Audiences not playing them anymore?

10
NATO apologism (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Incase anyone tells you that lemmy.ml is not a tankie instance.

94
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It feels like new games are just more of the same, with no real meaning. However I recently started playing "Return of the Obra Dihn" and love open ended deduction in it. It feels like I'm actually figuring things out by myself without being handheld through it. Are there any other games that don't coddle the player that you guys recommend?

1
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
The Disrespect (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

Thought this was a political alignment chart

21
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The games they release are complete in them selves, and with 15-20€ dlces every ~6 months they keep the games fresh with new content.

People rarely complain that features are missing from their games until it gets added in a DLC. Then suddenly it's a mandatory feature.

[-] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago

Post nut clarity hits hard

[-] [email protected] 102 points 2 years ago

You could have done anything else than write this comment

[-] [email protected] 40 points 2 years ago

Mine would be "Subhuman Sweden player" on War Thunder.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 2 years ago

From an IT perspective, blockchain technology is a solution in search of a problem. From an environmental perspective, crypto is a disaster. From an economical perspective it's too unstable to be anything but gambling.

Buying drugs over the internet is the only real reason crypto currencies can be useful. Hell even in person it's better to use cash.

view more: next ›

bigboismith

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago