this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
149 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22131 readers
3823 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's insane that it might be possible that Trump is allowed to be a candidate

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well actually the antithesis of democracy, but ig many are taught to believe otherwise

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

We're not the antithesis of a democracy, we're just a really shitty alpha version of a democracy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The system the USA has is very far from a democracy, and they're not even attempting to reach alpha, beta or any development of it. Oh actually maybe in some local elections they're on the alpha level, but we don't really hear much on how they work in the rest of the world.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Democracy being hijacked, right in front of our eyes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'd be okay if they do it virtually or behind a screen where the rules are clear and they mute you when it's not your turn to speak.

It should be a debate, not a loudness contest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I’d just bring a spray bottle and every time Trump lied, I’d spray him until they ended it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He'd end up drowning in that rats nest on his angry lil Head.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

You'd empty that bottle before he finished his opening statement

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The bigger news to me is that Howard Stern is still alive and on the air.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

Can't wait for the inevitable 'sleepy Joe' comment to get a rejoinder like "Come on, drowsy don, with all those courtroom naps I thought you would have dreamed to a new nickname. All that trump twilight not working out for you?"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why would Biden debate him? After all he’s the omnipotent president of the United States of America and therefore unilaterally legally immune to all mortal laws, legislation, litigation and prosecution according to Conservative doctrine.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

I'd like to see Biden ask him one question. "Mr ex president facing 91 felonies, please elaborate for me, this presidential immunity....In detail...while I clean my gun"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Because if he doesn’t, trumps people will chant “chicken!” And make bwak bwak noises. Powerful argument there.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think any real debate has to, at a very minimum, involve mics being cut off at very precise times and letting someone speak, uninterrupted when it is their turn. The notion of talking over one another - how the fuck is that a "debate"?

Also, people, assisted by tools, capable of doing fact checking in real time. Maybe even cutting down their mic time based on how many lies they have told up to that point during the debate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Totally logical and reasonable. I doubt it will ever happen, but it would be amazing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This would go down just like the proverbial chess playing against a pigeon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

They've debated before and Donnie didn't come off so well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Except there would be less crap with a pigeon

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

That would be the same as security cam footage from a retirement home. I imagine one of them just randomly walking away at one point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The amount of work campaigners and media are doing to try to keep these two walking corpses to appear vaguely conscience is a real testament to the effectiveness of the modern campaign apparatus.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Most braindead take. Biden is getting shit done.

Trump is under 91 indictments and was found to be a rapist.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Biden is getting shit done

Facilitating a genocide and banning social media apps? You're right, that is shit.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›