this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
618 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

70461 readers
2251 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But anyone who’s ready to raise their hands for brain surgery might want to hear what one of the Neuralink co-founders recently said during an interview with the Wall Street Journal.

The Wall Street Journal podcast The Future of Everything recently sat down with Dr. Benjamin Rapoport, a neurosurgeon who co-founded Neuralink with Musk and a team of scientists back in 2016.

Rapoport left Neuralink to start his own company called Precision Neuroscience and one specific part of the interview really stood out to us.

Brain-computer interfaces have made tremendous strides in the past decade, allowing people to literally control machines with their thoughts.

Companies like Musk’s Neuralink tend to get all the headlines, but there are a number of firms, including Synchron, Paradromics, and Precision Neuroscience.

Neuralink has received plenty of criticism over the years, with MIT Technology Review calling it “neuroscience theater” back in 2020, and horrifying allegations of monkey torture were revealed in 2022.


The original article contains 608 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

On one hand, yea I don't want brain damage. On the other hand, if it means I can move robotic limbs after being paralyzed, maybe it's still worth it?

Like the idea of having neural interfaces that don't penetrate the brain is obviously great, but if that tech doesn't come for another 50 years, what are the current people going to do instead?

I'm not on the waiting list for Neuralink, but if I'm gonna be honest, the hate for it is over amplified.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

if it means I can move robotic limbs after being paralyzed, maybe it's still worth it?

I don't mind the progress in science and technology.

I don't mind sacrificing some animals for that goal.

The really terrible thought is that Elon is allowed to decide these things.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think the concept is bad. I take a medicine that may give me cognition problems when I'm very old, but it's remarkably effective for me right now and provides a significant quality of life improvement. So, I've chosen to stay on it.

That's different I think though from Neuralink as it is today. There need to be stringent safety measures in place and controls on testing. We've come a long way on neurology, but we still have a lot we don't understand.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›