this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
254 points (100.0% liked)

memes

14074 readers
2738 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Post title)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arquebus_x@kbin.social 62 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That phrase doesn't mean what you think it means.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Drinking glasses. Not planned obsolescence but a way to remove klutzes like me from the pool.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say a drinking glass is a device, a simple tool yes but not a device.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

They could still make them unbreakable. Yet they choose not too. Its all a plot by big glass.

[–] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

There is some truth to that Superfest - of course they tried to sell it to the wrong people

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago

To be fair, you'd have to drop an awful lot of bubbles to not be let back in the pool.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Not really. Unless you think dishes are planned obsolescence.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I crashed my boat into a rock. PLANNED OBSOLESCENCE.

Yeah this one was easy to break. I originally up voted the post, but quickly changed my mind.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hmm... maybe. You should look up East German Superfest glass. Big dishware producers refused to use it because it meant not selling replacement dishes.

Though, OP's argument is just dumb.

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Now that you mention it, we live in the future! Where are my indestructible, microwave-safe, and machine-wash safe plates? Don't say plastic, those get weird with high temperatures.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Superfest made them. None of the glass makers and distributers would buy them because they were practically indestructible, so they couldn't see infinite sales.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Bro just dropped his brand new Galaxy Fold/Flip/pixel from way too high and found out they need a case.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Hell, I even have protectors on the camera lenses.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Humans will break anything and everything that we use regardless of size shape or function just depends on how fast. Long as every piece is replaceable and repairable then it doesn't matter if it breaks

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

[–] SGG@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's a constant race between inventors and the universe. Inventors are trying to create idiot proof devices, and the universe is creating better idiots.

The universe is winning.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Is dropping a smartphone from a standing height the work of an idiot? Sounds like something a smartphone designer might say, but I think OPs point is valid. Don't even get me started on cases. Eventually history will look at smartphone cases the way we look at plastic on furniture from the 50s.

[–] SGG@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There's always a trade off when it comes to any device.

Fast or slow, lots of features or basic, cheap or expensive, thin/stylish or ruggedized, water or other ingress resistant standards. All of these have to be weighted against each other.

Also what constitutes a drop? 4 feet, 40 feet, 400? (sorry if I turned on anyone with a foot fetish)

It is absolutely possible to create a mobile phone with most features people want that survives multiple 4 foot high drops, but it will be encased in a few cm of rubber, the touch screen will be under a noticeable screen protector, and reception might suffer a bit, and it won't have wireless charging unless you're ok if that stops working after a unlucky drop. It will also probably be expensive, even more so if you then want to use more premium materials in order to try and slim it down some.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago

I mean, my mobile phone was like 350aud, has survived literally dozens of drops from 4ft+, on a variety of surfaces from carpet and lino to gravel, concrete and bitumen. Literally every function of the phone works fine and there's no case, just a screen protector. It didn't come with wireless charging so I don't know how fragile that would be, but current phones are tough as shit.

The chassis of my phone is dented and smashed in dozens of places and everything it could do new it can do now just the same, except for looking pretty.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Uh, not really what planned obsolescence is.

Though I do wonder how much more durable they would be if corning made it 1 mm instead of 0.4 mm thick.

Manufacturers can also improve durability by recessing the screen slightly into a plastic frame, that way when the phone drops on its corner or side on a hard object, it will reduce the likelihood of it cracking.

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Uh, not really what planned obsolescence is.

You’re right, but I couldn’t think of a short term for this. I found ‘bad’ design too broad, and it’s not ‘hostile’ design either.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Probably just designed to fail maybe?

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I agree that there should be phones that prioritize sturdiness for clumsy people, but I see things like sturdiness and waterproof capabilities used as an excuse to get rid of useful features, and I don't like it. I've had cell phones for over 2 decades, and I've never dropped one; having an SD card slot and headphone jack is much more important to me than durability, since I rarely hold it over water, and always make sure to keep a solid grip regardless of the circumstances.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I've had cell phones for over 2 decades, and I've never dropped one

Pressing X to doubt.

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Meh, I can see that, my dad is the same way, the trick is he hardly uses one and treats it like an OSHA situation when he's operating it.

TBH it's not the worst habit to have.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I guarantee you, he would still have dropped it at least once in two decades of use.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Samsungs have been advertising water resistance to 10m for yeeeears with headphone jacks and sdcard slots. It's not exclusive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tinyVoltron@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I call bullshit.

[–] iarigby@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

For you maybe, I drop my phone at least once a week.

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

That's exactly my point. Different people have different needs, so while OP is right that there should be phones for themselves and yourself that address the fact that a significant portion of the population drop their phones regularly, my own needs follow a different hierarchy that benefits from a separate set of features.

The fact that phones are all kinda just the same, with any changes made to one model frequently rippling through to other models from other manufacturers in time, is an issue. The customization to phones shouldn't only apply to external features like cases and dongles.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Me too, and I feel like I'm pretty careful. But when you're always holding/moving a fragile thing, accidents happen over time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 10 months ago

If the parts that break are either unavailable or incredibly difficult to replace then I agree. (Held in by glue I'm looking at you ya bastard)

But just because it breaks doesn't mean it's planned obsolescence.

Where I work in the freight industry we have little handhelds we're supposed to use that get dropped all the time. Occasionally the screens break or the cameras break. Both of them are held in by screws and are swappable in that event.

Fairphone is a device I'd love to get as they are very easily fixable but they still break when dropped. The parts are readily available for purchase as well. It's just not easy if you're outside of the EU.

[–] Mastengwe@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Human beings: planned obsolescence.

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

Thank you very much for your kind words, my dear sir.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, no. The forces of suddenly being stopped even after a few feet can be extremely difficult to mitigate. Most electronics can survive being dropped once, but few are able tp be dropped multiple times, and 'withstand being dropped' sounds like it would cover multiple drops.

The surface matters too. Most electronics are fine dropped on carpet, but fail on concrete because the surfaces are different.

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

I’m using my old Nokia to this day. And why? Because “suddenly being stopped even after a few feet” wasn’t “difficult to mitigate” for Nokia. In the last 15 years this thing must have survived more than 100 drops, sometimes down a staircase. When I pick up the back cover, the battery and the SIM card, it’s as good as new.

[–] alehc@slrpnk.net 6 points 10 months ago
[–] amio@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

With phones, like with other things, a bit of protective covering goes a long way.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I dropped my handset a bunch of times - came out second in a fight once and wrecked some nerves in my hand - but it survived every time.

It's when we were abroad and trying to rent those funny little scooters that I dropped it on cobblestones and it was insta-dead. And me having already done arrive-can with my info stored on my phone that's now unusable. Wheeee.

I don't think even an otterbox would have saved it, though. The universe has a sense of humour and it's a very dark one.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments