spoiler
ln(2) because the Taylor series for ln(1+x) evaluated at x=1 is exactly this series.
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)
Daily Maths Challenges
216 readers
1 users here now
Share your cool maths problems.
Complete a challenge:
- Post your solution in comments, if it is exactly the same as OP's solution, let us know.
- Have fun.
Post a challenge:
- Doesn't have to be original, as long as it is not a duplicate.
- Challenges not riddles, if the post is longer than 3 paragraphs, reconsider yourself.
- Optionally include solution in comments, let it be clear this is not a homework help forums.
- Tag [unsolved] if you don't have a solution yet.
- Please include images, if your question includes complex symbols, attach a render of the maths.
Feel free to contribute to a series by DMing the OP, or start your own challenge series.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
yup thats the intended solution, im not really familiar with taylor series yet, but maybe for a person who knows taylor series would be able to see it right away
Hint
spoiler
The solution I have in mind is related to the Taylor series
Hint 2
spoiler
It converges to -ln(2), but why
Solution:
There closest I was able to do on the fly was to show that the ::: pairwise sum has an integral of -ln(2)/2 ::: but that was pretty hand wavy. I'll have to check how it's actually done.