this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
98 points (100.0% liked)

Game Development

4246 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the game development community! This is a place to talk about and post anything related to the field of game development.

Community Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lot of old games have become unplayable on modern hardware and operating systems. I wrote an article about how making games open source will keep them playable far into the future.

I also discuss how making games open source could be beneficial to developers and companies.

Feedback and constructive criticism are most welcome, and in keeping with the open source spirit, I will give you credit if I make any edits based on your feedback.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago

There is a reason doom runs on everything.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not only do the games need to be opensource, but their toolchains too. It would also be great if everything were stored in content-addressable storage. Then it wouldn't be necessary to track down stuff by follow URL paths to dead domains.

I hope that opensource game engines become more popular. It might just be a matter of time. Blender is now very popular and that's opensource.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

I agree, it is better to be open source all the way. I believe Godot became more popular after Unity tried to charge developers per install.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I agree with you, that’s why I don’t believe in paying for closed source

There is an issue with letting future generations enjoy content in that they may be less inclined to buy remasters or sequels

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Let's not create 4 reposts such that the discussion is at one place and not spread out paper thin?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

That's an inherent problem of the current Lemmy implementation, though, isn't it?

If you don't spread-post, it doesn't reach the appropriate communities and people, and communities are missing content. If you do, discussions are spread by community and posts, with only cross-post links under the post.

I'm hoping to someday be surprised that they are suddenly in a shared view by default. I haven't checked whether there's a feature request for it.