this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1392 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

12736 readers
174 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If corpos start dynamically charging for shit, im gonna start to dynamically disassemble they're stores with vodka, some paper and a lighter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dynamic pricing should be illegal. A price for a product should be the same for everyone and not dependant on their income, which smartphone brand they use or how much yoghurt they eat per day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Are you saying products are not worth their price?

surprised pikachu

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You know a much better way to do this? Government oversight on pricing of staples to prevent shit like $4 cartons of eggs and $5 sticks of butter like we had in 2022/23

Stop these companies from gouging us on products we need by making it impossible for them to get away with it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

"If you're starving, we'll use an API with your bank to charge you $10 more than your entire net worth. In that moment we'll offer you a credit card with a 37% adjustable interest rate that only adjusts up to cover the overage (but credit card takes 6-8 business days to process, so you will go over). We'll then be left with no choice but to also process an overdraft fee on your bank account with daily penalties for the overage since you are being irresponsible.

And we'll use AI to generate a picture of everyone you love in a room laughing at you, because fuck you. By overdrafting, you triggered a clause in our user agreement (that you agreed to) which states that we can charge you whatever we think it's fair for that picture. The picture will then regenerate each month, indefinitely, on an auto subscription, unless you cancel by hand delivering a paper cancellation form to our cancellation office in Guam."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

That "to each according to his need" is the important part here. It's not going to help anyone, it's going to like pockets

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

greedy workers hoarding all their income

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

sees title

So how many people are below the poverty line?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Now, if the extra paid were to go to help those less fortunate. To make the community better, etc. This may not be such a bad thing.

And if the "pay more" was based solely on how much money you have, not how much you're likely to want the thing being bought.

But capitalism has to capitalism and so the extra goes to rich assholes yacht and bunker funds.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I agree to an extent, but watch out for this:

Now, if the extra paid were to go to help those less fortunate. To make the community better, etc. This may not be such a bad thing

That's what they'll claim. They'll say the people with money are subsidizing the poor single mothers with two jobs (but they'll say it in a way that makes people feel good) so that they can get reasonably priced groceries. But we all know that those poor single mothers will be paying the current margins while everyone else is paying extra that goes directly to profit those at the top.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Agreed fully. Capitalists must capitalize, especially when those being capitalized have no choice.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And now I'm stealing the product

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Getting pretty sick of being bled dry by greedy wealth hoarders who have captured the regulatory system. Looking more and more like they WANT violence.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Ya'll, this already happens - wholesale and retail pricing vs consumer pricing. This exact principle is why many states refuse sales tax - those disproportionately affect poorer people because a lot of rich people can buy items through their LLCs and get bulk or retailer pricing.

Costco has memberships based on this - there's the regular and then the executive memberships. You spend more on the higher level memberships (essentially an income check) and also get more money back later. Credit card promos function like this. Credit scores and loans function like this.

Grocery stores (capital) will never give us a break on food (money). They will always try to find a way to make the poor pay even more. That's why it's called capitalism - all that is valued is capital and capital accrues more capital. That's the game.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›