this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
162 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68348 readers
3761 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Are they generating more power than they are spending by making the train go? Has Barcelona mastered perpetual motion??

It's good thing, sure, but it's no savior. The blurb makes it sound like it's a net gain of energy, and that's impossible. It's not free energy. It's just upcycled waste.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I don't read it as magical energy created out of nothing, but I do read it as "free" energy that would exist whether this regeneration system is used or not, that would otherwise be lost as heat.

With or without regenerative braking, the train system is still going to accelerate stopped trains up to operational speed, then slow them down to a stop, at regular intervals throughout the whole train system. Tapping into that existing energy is basically free energy at that point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Only because of the speed of the train. Fuel spent accelerating to later brake is wasted fuel. More efficient would be spending only enough fuel to come to a full stop without braking.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

So you want the trains to coast from station to station? Do you really believe that or is it very important for you to be right?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Efficient from an electrical standpoint, but not a transportation one. You can't "improve" it so much that it no longer does the thing it's supposed to do.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Sure, and that's not a bad thing. But what is revolutionary and newsworthy about what Barcelona is doing?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Did you click on the article? It’s made very clear very early in the article that they have added regenerative braking systems to the trains. This is well established technology. It’s in every Prius since 1997 so I would think you wouldn’t be confused about whether this is perpetual motion or if they are making grand claims of net energy surplus. It doesn’t say any of that. It’s cool that they are applying the technology in this way. Why does this seem confusing to you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because it sounds like somebody just found out about the technology and decided to make an article about it like it's some sort of new and novel thing, when it's really not.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

I think you’re projecting those expectations onto it. I’m totally fine to hear that a notable city has successfully implemented a cool technology even if it’s not some world first for science, and I don’t think the headline overhypes this for what it is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

The revolution is that they are doing something that has existed since the early 1900s... But it's in Barcelona so it's chic.

It's cool and all that, and likely just a side effects of the new trains having that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

It's also the default for commuter trains, they pretty much all do it.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Regenerative braking on commuter trains is nothing new, it's been around for decades.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, but here it is done highly effective. The 1.8 degree temperature difference is a huge plus too - they can now also save serious amounts of power on ventilation.
TfL, you listening?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Victoria, Circle, District, Hammersmith and City, Metropolitan and the new Piccadilly Line trains (due soon) all have regenerative braking. The rest will follow as new trains are procured.

As anyone who travels on the Victoria line in the summer will tell you: it helps, but not much.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And even in some prototype bus, the Gyrobus, in the 50's that used an electrically charged flywheel that was also (to some degree) regeneratively recharged when breaking:

Rather than carrying an internal combustion engine or batteries, or connecting to overhead powerlines, a gyrobus carries a large flywheel that is spun at up to 3,000 RPM by a "squirrel cage" motor.[1] Power for charging the flywheel was sourced by means of three booms mounted on the vehicle's roof, which contacted charging points located as required or where appropriate (at passenger stops en route, or at terminals, for instance). To obtain tractive power, capacitors would excite the flywheel's charging motor so that it became a generator, in this way transforming the energy stored in the flywheel back into electricity. Vehicle braking was electric, and some of the energy was recycled back into the flywheel, thereby extending its range.

Source: Wikipedia: Gyrobus

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

That's incredible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Nice, it’s probably the ancestor of the TOSA which is the same thing without the flywheel, and also from Switzerland.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

It is, though, as the name of the community implies, “technology.”

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago

It also reduces brake wear on the trains, so they'll need new brakes less often, and it improves air quality in the stations. Most of that black dust you see is brake dust. And you're breathing it in, too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why can't they use the excess energy to make the train go again?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

They do... 1/3rd of it is used that way.