this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
120 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45629 readers
3244 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So they're going to pay the UN to put it back up, right? ... Right?!

[–] yarrage@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A stern wording is in order!

[–] Prefeitura@lemmy.eco.br 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wonder what would happen if un started to defend their bases...

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Prefeitura@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 5 months ago

They are already being called hamas just for being there. Then they might as well defend their positions, as they would do if any enemy force attacked them. Israel gets away with too many privileges.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What were they watching out for anyway? That is clear for Hezbollah to fire rockets?

They don't need a watchtower to not even try to implement UN1701.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 40 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Contrary to Israeli lies UNIFIL is fullfilling their mandate as best as is possible in the given limits. eing shot at by Israel certainly doesn't help.

UNIFIL conducted 18 Patrols a day looking for illegal weapons in the area in the period from February to June. They removed multiple Hezbollah weapons caches.

They also dilligently monitored fire from both sides in the area, with an overwhelming majority being Israeli attacks. This also explains why Israel is eager to remove UNIFIL monitoring capeabilities.

https://unifil.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/s_2024_548-en.pdf

If the UNIFIL mandate was expanded to include proactive fighting, it would be against Israels interests as the majority of breaches of resolution 1701 are coming from the Israeli side.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

How dare UNIFIL not glaze zionist dick

[–] Atin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The vast majority of breaches are by Hezbollah. Until the current round of fighting things were relatively peaceful between Israel and the Lebanese government.

[–] koper@feddit.nl 13 points 5 months ago

That's an obvious lie. If you bothered to actually read the report, you can see on page 2 that the vast majority of shots are coming from Israel.

[–] SoJB@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How does your comment even make sense. No, seriously. Please explain it. How would the UN mission there be watching that “is clear for Hezbollah to fire rockets”.

Are you fucking insane or just a terrorist genocide supporter?

At some point the UN peacekeepers will... you know, need to actually start keeping the peace. By .. means necessary.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Reuters - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Reuters:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/unifil-says-israeli-army-demolished-watchtower-fence-un-site-southern-lebanon-2024-10-20/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support