this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
524 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22294 readers
3641 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 139 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Now we know why he told Tucker if Trump loses he’s going to prison.

We are in full holy shit Russia is inside the hen house mode.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago

There's also the FTC investigation and potential Enron/Theranos-like collapse of Tesla. The election isn't the only area where Elon is prone too wildly misleading claims, and fortunately the finance sector is regulated a bit better than less essential things like electing the leader of the free world and not letting traitorous criminals topple democracy

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

And yet mentions of things like this are treated as lunacy by certain users.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If Elon goes to jail, what will happen to his companies?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They might actually start making good decisions.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Tesla discontinued the Cybertruck

SpaceX remains unchanged

X/Twitter removes bots

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

It would be pretty cool if SpaceX stopped speedrunning turning their surrounding lands into MadMax style polluted wastelands, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Depends on if the companies are involved in anything illegal or just him.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 88 points 5 months ago (2 children)

crazy how american media is not reporting on this traitor

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 60 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I mean, it says right at the top of the article:

Source: The Wall Street Journal

Should it be reported on more? Absolutely. But it's disingenuous to say American media is not reporting it.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would guess they mean american media in general instead of just one of them.

The general public didn't read the WSJ, and being behind a paywall hasn't increased the number of people who do.

[–] Omodi@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

It's a WSJ exclusive from 9 last night. It's not surprising there are not a lot of articles about it yet. The media sucks there is no reason to bitch about nothing.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Probably also that it's been a full two years plus and nobody's said anything while he's raking in billions from the US government for sensitive national programs including the Ukranian army's internet connectivity.

[–] lemmyman@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Is Wall Street Journal not American?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A banana is not a bunch of bananas. Right?

WSJ is not "American media" by the same token.

[–] lemmyman@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It seems kind of silly to expect all media companies to immediately cover a story that broke less than 12 hours earlier.

But it's starting to happen. Happy?

Are Elon Musk and Vladimir Putin Talking? https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/25/business/dealbook/musk-putin-trump.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago

... It's not the Berlin wall? What other lies have I been told??????????!?!!!¿‽

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)

please try him for treason, please please please

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

"Off with his head!"

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 47 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Elon talks to Putin and Putin is Trumps master. I have a feeling we are being played by Putin.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The whole Western world is being played by Putin. Right wing parties are on the rise in pretty much every Western country and every single one has had suspicious connections to Russia.

[–] TooPoor@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I think you're onto something here.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

librul conspirasee!! nO cOlLuSiOn! Lamestream mediar lies! freeze peaches!

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (3 children)

One thing is, there is a 99% chance that the NSA recorded the conversation

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Probably, but whether they can understand it depends on whether Musk and Putin used decent end-to-end encryption. You'd expect they would, in which case the NSA may effectively have only the metadata.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

My sweet child...you think the NSA cannot break encryption?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (14 children)

I think it's possible they can't, depending on the algorithm used and whether they have low-level access to hardware and/or firmware. It's possible that some of the recommended algorithms were chosen for subtle NSA backdoors, and I'm sure they have a lot of resources to throw at high-value communications, but I'd be surprised if every algorithm in current use, with large enough keys, can be cracked by them. A low-level backdoor in the hardware device itself would be a different matter, and this seems like a more practical approach for the NSA than cracking the encryption directly, particularly where the participants are taking extra care. So I'd say it's possible but not certain that they can hear/read these conversations.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That does presuppose they don't have a direct tap on either or both lines somewhere.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

To get around end-to-end encryption the tap would have to be in the phone handset itself or a vulnerability in the code. I wouldn't rule either out.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you don't understand what the government/military technology is capable of, I'm sorry. I had a coworker who worked in and around extremely high level military surveillance years ago. Back then, they had the capability of turning on any cell phone microphone or camera and real time listen in. He wouldnt go beyond that, but did say/ the surveillance satellites in movies have nothing on current (even back then) capabilities. Imagine now

We are just now learning of Locate X who can pinpoint almost any phone location, tie it to advertising id's and view its movement history, and build an entire picture of what virtually any person on this planet is doing. That's just a company, not the government.

At this point in my life, I view anti tracking, ad block, encryption, alternate OSs etc. as keeping honest people honest. Military/govt. tech has ways around it all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (18 children)

AES is freely available and if they knew of any weaknesses it probably wouldn't be approved for use on TS data.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What's wrong with Musk's face? Was he in some kind of accident?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

With to many "beauty" operations you cannot use your face muscles without things getting weird.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's the cheek where he stores his sperm.

[–] pech@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

*Putin's sperm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 15 points 5 months ago

Seems like a conflict for Ukraine and the US Military.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago
[–] KeefChief13@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago
[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Elon is a treat for the world and humanity in general.

[–] MrBobDobalina@lemmy.nz 3 points 5 months ago

God I hope you meant to type 'threat'

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Ukrayinska Pravda (The Ukrainian Truth) - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Ukrayinska Pravda (The Ukrainian Truth):

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Ukraine
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/10/25/7481306/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

load more comments