this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
201 points (100.0% liked)

Games

38046 readers
758 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Woof, what a bad response.

(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I was not surprised how well Astro Bot did. It was accessible and well made. Sam Lake nailed it with his little speech.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Game Awards lost any credibility at this point. Black Myth Wukong truly deserved the grand prize. I played the game and I believe it, both the concurrent steam players and sales numbers confirm it as well

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

It never had any credibility, no awards show does. It's always a way for the richest and most powerful of an industry to jerk themselves off.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Pizza Tower: «First time?.»

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

This game looked nice and was awful to play. There isnt really anything else to say.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Aren't the game awards, just a panel of a handful of members. If so, not sure the award means much.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Thx, aren't many of those outlets owned by same conglomerate?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

There are definitely some large chunks. But there have been no signs of any of those outlets caring enough to try to vote as a bloc.

There are definitely a lot of flaws in how the jury is selected and many (most?) of the judges past and present have pointed that out. Stuff like how they are fundamentally not qualified to judge fighting games as fighting games or the mess that is the "simulation and strategy" category or whatever they call "PC games" where people are somehow comparing MS Flight Sim to Farm Simulator to Satisfactory.

But for stuff like the major awards? It is a pretty diverse crowd and there is no indication that any group cares enough to rig the vote beyond group discords where people pester other games media folk because they want to play Helldivers again and their usual crew are busy.


I'll also add on that, for its many many flaws, the keighleys is pretty good about being aware of this kind of thing based on a few outlets that talked about how they were judges in the past and then suddenly never mentioned it again after an acquisition or the loss of a core editor.

[–] Semjaza 1 points 4 months ago

I'll also add on that, for its many many flaws, the keighleys is pretty good about being aware of this kind of thing based on a few outlets that talked about how they were judges in the past and then suddenly never mentioned it again after an acquisition or the loss of a core editor.

Is that /s?
Because that last sentence really gives me pause for thought...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

No, I don't think so. Maybe a couple but it's a pretty wide net. Which ones did you think were?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›