this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
596 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

14406 readers
1189 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What if life's evolutionary end point is always sentience?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then life is even more pointless and cruel than it appears.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

That would be poetically fitting for an universe determined to die a heat death.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

It’s OK. Consciousness is but a brief anomaly in the vast sea of time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

"The material, sensuously perceptible world to which we ourselves belong is the only reality.... Our consciousness and thinking, however supra-sensuous they may seem, are the product of a material, bodily organ, the brain. Matter is not a product of mind, but mind itself is merely the highest product of matter." — Karl Marx

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Speak for yourself. I try not to think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If by consciousness, you just mean thinking, then sure.

But if you mean awareness — “phenomena”, if you prefer — then I don’t see why an experiential state would (or could) be entirely secondary to a physical state.

It is, after all, possible for me to write words and perform other physical actions based on my experiential state. In many ways, my mental world is more “real” than the physical world.

For what it’s worth, I don’t think rejecting physicalism necessarily requires embracing the idea of a soul. I’m an atheist, and a neutral monist, for example. But if I had to choose between only physicalism and idealism, idealism makes more sense. Before anything else, I’m conscious.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Action potential doesn't do thinking. Thinking happens at neuron junctions and that shits chemical and analogue. The electrical part just moves the data to the next synapse. There are some gap junctions but those aren't really associated with thinking.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›