As well they should be: again, the question is: "WHAT liberal media?"
By "liberal media", do the delusional RWNJs mean: ABC/NBC/CBS/PBS/NPR/Wapo/NYT/CNN/MSNBC? If so, the idea that these corporations are "liberal" is a joke.
this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
120 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22730 readers
3278 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Don't tell lies about the President and maybe you won't get sued...simple as that
As if sexual assault charges are any better than rape...
And there were no charges anyway. It was a civil case ɓrought by a woman that claims something happened like 30 years ago. New York even changed a law just so the lawsuit could be brought.
Lol, it wasn't sexual assault either. Nice try though
Then what did the jury find him guilty of then? Heavy petting?
Congrats, you made me wonder what the specifics were enough to look it up.
Here's the case info for anyone else that's similarly curious: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html
The high-profile 2023 case began when E. Jean Carroll sued Donald Trump for sexual assault and defamation.
Directly from the case file summary.. You're making up semantic differences for what I can only assume are bogus bad faith reasons, so you can argue with people. I think you're on the wrong site.
Comment history points to bullshit. Just block and continue on.
Sexual abuse, that's what it was and the only reason he was even in court over it was because New York actually changed a law so they could bring the lawsuit in the first place. They found someone willing to accuse him of doing something like 30 years ago, lol. Since the other lawfare cases weren't hurting his campaign enough (or at all actually) they decided to give this a shot, but obviously most of the country wasn't buying it and elected him for President
Wow, you are a grade A moron... or a troll either way. Go away, this comment was made like a month ago
Sure bud, whatever makes you feel better
Sexual abuse survivors regularly keep the abuse to themselves. Read a goddammit book once in a while. Ask me how I know that.
Looks like you need to read a book or two judging by your comment
Right... and sexual abuse survivor needs to read a book. Just proving my point with that response.