this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

32215 readers
554 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This might sound wild or controversial, but has anyone thought about using the bluesky app and adapt it to work with the mastodon API? By this way making it easier for more people?

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I will check it out, but for what I heard is to post in multiple sites with the same app, right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I feel like billionaire media isnt okay so no, the thought would never ever cross my mind.

But i can see how different folks need different strokes so go ahead.

All I ask is that folks keep in mind that this is a centralized social media platform that has a size advantage over the fedisverse (i assume) and therefore poses a threat of barren wasteland attack.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think you misunderstood what I'm referring to. The bluesky app is open source and it has the same UI as twitter, basically. I'm talking about forking the project to make it compatible with Mastodon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I perfectly well understood what you meant. The issue is that bluesky is barely different from xitter and threads. If those two brought an open source app I wouldnt touch that either. Mind you, meta releases open source stuff, as does microsoft. Just because they’re evil doesnt mean they wouldnt do it.

We have an ongoing debate in the fediverse if we should be open to (e.g.) federating with those services if it comes to it (in case of threads, it did). I‘m a signee of the fedipact but I hold all billionaire media in that regard for the future.

Working on intercompatibility is the same thing and everyone has the right to do whatever they like. I have the right to let you know that there are risks involved. One example out of the top of my head: bluesky could decide to block your app or display ads for the „real app“ since it is a proprietary backend that you have to call from the app.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It seems like it, hahaha. What I wanted to convey was a fork of https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app built to work with Mastodon API.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

This is kinda what Surf will be, no? Still in closed beta but it aims to be a browser for the entire federated net, including Threads and Bluesky and all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think often people find it easier to write their own code than to make changes to other people's projects, so it's not necessarily very easy to change the Bluesky app to work with the Mastodon API rather than the Bluesky one.

That said, I don't think it's a dumb idea. Bluesky has a lot of money to pump into UX development, so making sure Mastodon users could benefit from this wouldn't be a bad thing. Personally I am perfectly happy with the alternatives already out there (Phanpy is better than anything else that has ever existed), but it's all about choice. :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think often people find it easier to write their own code than to make changes to other people’s projects

A rarely mentioned weakness of open source, and it can only be getting worse given the narcissism of younger generations.

I regularly see cases of multiple projects with exactly the same goals. All that duplication of effort just to serve the vanity of the respective project leaders. The wasted potential for good software has to be huge.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I feel like this is part of what makes @[email protected] one of the most important fediverse projects at the moment - it aims to keep everyone from having to do the same, overly complicated job of activitypub integration over and over and over again.

It's frustration that nobody wants to dig into old code, but I get frustrated having to re-work my own code from a year ago. So I guess I sympathize.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Interesting insight, thx.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is for connecting Bluesky accounts to Mastodon (and the other way too).

An OP wants to use Bluesky app as a client of Mastodon

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That doesn't make any sense

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Which part does not make any sense for you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

@clot27 atm you could use mastodon client like ivory for your bluesky account through skybridge but idk if we still can