this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
35 points (94.9% liked)

Selfhosted

44902 readers
1456 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm running Docker on Ubuntu server; around 50 containers running, most admin via Portainer. Configuration files and small databases for container applications are stored on the local SSD, media and larger files are stored on a NAS.

NAS data and the container folders are backed up.

I have a second identical machine doing nothing. What would you recommend researching to add resilience to this setup? Top priority is quick and easy restoration should the SSD fail - everything else is relatively easy to replace.

I'll create an SSD RAID but I like the idea of a second host.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eluvatar@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Container orchestration is what you're looking for. Kubernetes is the most popular, but it might be overkill it's hard to say based on your setup. However it's definitely useful experience to know how to run it.

[–] Sim@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks. Could I achieve a simple 2-host solution with Kubernetes though?

[–] eluvatar@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Nothing about k8s is simple. But yes you can achieve that.

Take a look at Rancher for actually running a cluster.

[–] mertn@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I put my dockers on mirrored zfs pool and have enough spare parts in case of breakdowns.

[–] Sim@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you have Docker itself on a single host (with parts) and all the containers in fault tolerant storage, and the most work you'd have to do in the event of host drive failure is to re-install the OS and Docker itself?

[–] mertn@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I have the OS (with docker) mirrored too. So no reinstalling, just disk or other parts swapping in case of a failure. I hope. A mothboard swap is the worst downtime. I have done this and needed to fiddle with network settings due to changed net interface name to get the server up again.

[–] mplewis@lemmy.globe.pub 5 points 2 years ago

Learning K8s is a lot to take on, but it will pay off as your needs expand in the long term — and if you decide to go into infra/ops at work.

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 2 points 2 years ago

It might be enough to just rsync stuff to the secondary regularly and the inactive machine monitor the active machine and just start all services as the active machine stops responding.

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
DNS Domain Name Service/System
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
NAS Network-Attached Storage
k8s Kubernetes container management package
nginx Popular HTTP server

4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 8 acronyms.

[Thread #162 for this sub, first seen 24th Sep 2023, 17:15] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]