this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
975 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

67536 readers
4734 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The real benchmark is: the world growing at 10 percent," he added. "Suddenly productivity goes up and the economy is growing at a faster rate. When that happens, we'll be fine as an industry."

Needless to say, we haven't seen anything like that yet. OpenAI's top AI agent — the tech that people like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman say is poised to upend the economy — still moves at a snail's pace and requires constant supervision.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

AI is burning a shit ton of energy and researchers’ time though!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Makes sense that the company that just announced their qbit advancement would be disparaging the only "advanced" thing other companies have shown in the last 5 years.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

For a lot of years, computers added no measurable productivity improvements. They sure revolutionized the way things work in all segments of society for something that doesn’t increase productivity.

AI is an inflating bubble: excessive spending, unclear use case. But it won’t take long for the pop, clearing out the failures and making successful use cases clearer, the winning approaches to emerge. This is basically the definition of capitalism

[–] capybara@lemm.ee 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What time span are you referring to when you say "for a lot of years"?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Vague memories of many articles over much of my adult life decrying the costs of whatever the current trend with computers is being higher than the benefits.

And I believe it, it’s technically true. There seems to be a pattern of bubbles where everyone jumps on the new hot thing, spend way too much money on it. It’s counterproductive, right up until the bubble pops, leaving the transformative successes.

Or I believe it was a long term thing with electronic forms and printers. As long as you were just adding steps to existing business processes, you don’t see productivity gains. It took many years for businesses to reinvent the way they worked to really see the productivity gains

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Joseph Weizenbaum: "No shit? For realsies?"

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 3 points 4 weeks ago
load more comments