this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
34 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1768 readers
33 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Hawke's Bay man is shocked after he was trespassed from his local supermarket following raising concerns about trollies blocking the fire exit.

Tony Hughes was visiting New World Havelock North earlier this month when he noticed the fire exit was blocked by trollies filled with reduce to clear goods and some baskets of clearance goods on the floor.

He told Morning Report he asked the manager if they would clear the exit and they agreed and thanked him.

However, when Hughes next returned to the store about 10 days later he noticed the fire exit was once again blocked.

"It was really a rinse and repeat, where I took a photo, went up to checkouts and asked to speak to a manager and again showed them a photo and asked them to sort it," he said.

Last Sunday, he popped into the store to get some bread and milk. This time he didn't look at the fire exit but on his way out the store security guard stopped him and trespassed him, Hughes said.

"When I asked why he said it was because I had taken photos around the store and that I was trespassed," Hughes said.

"For privacy reasons we don't discuss individual customer matters but generally speaking, the decision to issue a trespass notice is made when there are genuine safety or security concerns," FoodStuffs said.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

Should have just directly reported it instead of being nice and telling the store about it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

generally speaking, the decision to issue a trespass notice is made when there are genuine safety or security concerns

How ironic

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

What is going on with the article's use of the word trespassed? Is there some other meaning I'm not aware of akin to barred/banned/ejected?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think that's what it means. As in, on the way out, the security guard told him he's not allowed back in the store because he was taking photos.

Which part used this term in an odd way?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I only know of trespassed to be the past tense of trespass. Trespass being to go somewhere you're not allowed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The usage may differ elsewhere, but in NZ law, a trespass order is a formal step that carries severe penalties if you breach it, barring you from a particular premises.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Ahh, this may be it, very good!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Talked about tresspass: https://www.police.govt.nz/use-105/trespass

If you do not want someone on a property you occupy, you can give them a trespass notice.

Trespassing is when someone (who is not the owner or occupier of the property):

  • enters your property (or a property you legally occupy - for example, as the tenant) after you have told them not to enter, or
  • refuses to leave after you have told them to leave

We seem to use the term "tresspass" both to mean someone is trasspassing, and also to mean giving someone a tresspass notice. If you tresspass someone from the premises, then you have given them a tresspass notice (verbal or written). It's probably a colloquial term.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Under NZ law you're not trespassing in a supermarket until you've been told about it.

To "trespass" someone is police-speak for to issue them with a trespass notice (verbally or in writing). In this article, "was trespassed" indicates he was the recipient of one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's the past tense gerunt verb, or something like that, or maybe the other way around.

It's not used in common speech even more so because trespass is rarely talked about anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. It's being formally told that they're not welcome back anymore, (even though it's a place that is normally open to the public), so that if the person comes back they would be subject to the law on trespassing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

He went about it all wrong, this is a problem you solve by not talking to the store at all, you simply call the fire Marshall, at my site the fire Marshall comes in and directly tells management where they can and can't put anything at all, and if they don't fix it in front of their eyes and keep it that way for the next time they do a surprise visit then jail time is on the table.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

This... would give me pause about New World Havelock North's attitude to food safety.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Not a good look from foodies

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, there's no way that's legal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

I can believe it. My flabbers would be way gasted if that happened to me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

He's probably marked as a crim in Auror now too.