this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2646 readers
37 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

Remember all the O&G and oligarch funded propaganda over the last two years, to get Poilievre into people's heads. It now turning sour in Canadians' minds is the most delicious turn of events for me.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

I wish him the luck he deserves

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Oh, I guess Poilievre is Canada’s public enemy No. 3 or 4?

[–] 4oreman@lemy.lol 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

kinda sad that trump is gonna take canada either way :-(

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sovereignty is non-negotiable. Canada can not simply be "taken", and the citizens of Canada will fight tooth and nail to protect ourselves. Are Americans truly going to be invested in occupying a country where a guerrilla insurgency against them will last for generations, where "the enemy" is indistinguishable from the occupiers, speaking the same language, and essentially looking the same?

They didn't have the stomach for it in Iraq or Afghanistan, and barring some nuclear crimes against humanity, they won't have the stomach for it in Canada either.

It's not "kinda sad" that Trump wants to "take" Canada. It's shameful that a longtime friend and ally is being treated in such despicable terms and that our sovereignty is being ignored. If this is how America treats its allies; what good is America's word for anyone on the world stage?

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago

Afghanistan and Iraq weren't bordering them either. How much more of a threat would that insurgency have been if they could cross the world's largest land border to strike inside American home territory?

Canadian insurgents could cross in and remain undetected far enough to strike anywhere in the US.

[–] 4oreman@lemy.lol 1 points 1 month ago

i still think it's kinda sad

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

America: Invades Canada

Geneva Convention authors: FFS, here we go again. How many new crimes will we have to add?

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If they invade Canada I will make it a personal goal to come up with as many new entries as I can.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

War crimes are bad but if the US invades us theyre gonna feel sooooo good.

[–] 4oreman@lemy.lol 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i mean it seems like trying to conqure another country is the only crime that needs to be listed

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Just look at our history in war