this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
44 points (100.0% liked)

Opensource

2280 readers
56 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Gonna give it a ahot

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not particularly fond of cuck licenses.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

what's with this language?

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Pretty sure it’s a shock and awe strategy by the author to make the term stick. And it worked.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i've never heard anyone refer to those licences with that term before now, and instantly made me shy away. it's not only shock and awe, it's a shitty take that plays on right-wing talking points to reframe "wanting to be useful to others" as something sexual. it's the stupidest take i've never seen.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You have the link to the guy’s blog, go shout that at him.

He’s proposing the GPL instead of these licenses, not exactly selfish. I don’t think the issue is being useful. Is complaining After people used your license as per its terms.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

you're aping him so i'm yelling at you.

what he's complaining about is called Open Source. the entire point of Open Source is to be an alternative to the GPL because people found its terms too strict to work with. ignoring years of history for the sake of a gotcha term with misogynist connotations is shitty.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You’re getting way too worked up against an internet stranger. Maybe take some time to appreciate what’s good around you and get into a better headspace.

And I strongly disagree cuck has any misogynist connotations, but that’s way beside the point.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 2 weeks ago

nah, i can compartmentalise just fine. internet strangers occupy a very small part of my day. licensing more so.

i could do a whole paragraph about my rationale on the term but i have a feeling it would benefit neither of us so i won't spend the energy.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It works to make others dismiss you and your arguments - I'll never take anyone seriously who decides to express themselves like this.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In case you haven’t noticed, I didn’t coin the term.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Cuck+%E2%80%9Clicense%E2%80%9D

The web did.

But don’t let that stop you on your crusade to clean the web of foul words. I wish you all the best.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Again: you choose to use the term. It's not a term you use for efficiency, as you have to explain to others what it means.

The web also didn't force you to use it.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That actually does describe the class of licences fairly accurately. Companies specifically love cuck licenses because of their unfree propagation properties.

Anti Commercial-AI license