Technology

68495 readers

3773 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

154

Eutelsat almost triples its value on prospect of Ukraine replacing Starlink with OneWeb (www.marketscreener.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Wispy2891@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They say they're a viable alternative to starlink and ready to start - not sure how much true is that

I read a musk fan saying "but their terminals aren't made in a NATO country" - isn't the same for starlink?

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

The Americans are definitely going to cut off StarLink, we don't have any option even if OneWeb isn't fully ready.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't checked all of them, but I looked up the first three receivers listed by Eutelsat Oneweb for "land mobility" usage. One was made in the US and UK, one was South Korean, and the one intended for military usage is Spanish. I guess South Korea is not NATO, but that's about the NATO-est non-NATO country there is

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

The US made one is the real issue. 😆