Since I'm the first to answer I get to take the easy one: racial prejudice against beast people. It's the obvious answer since it's expected that the reader is on the side of the cute cat girls. There is zero depth. Cat girls = cute --> people against cat girls = bad. I'm 100% on board with that, but I'd like to see some more nuance every once in a while. A very good example of what I'd like to see more of would be in "Zilbagias the Demon Prince". It's really a standout title in that regard.

[singing]Only a cat girl can call another cat girl cat girl ♫♫

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

For sure. It often extends to elves and stuff to. "Why are you talking with that DEMI?!" Even though in many instances the demi human races are superior to humans they are still shunned and oppressed.

As much as I like the Shield Hero anime, it really messes with this trope. Raftalia is a beast person slave. But because she's cute and a little girl spear jerk wants to "rescue" her. And then Spear jerk hates Filo when she's a bird but loves her when she's a cute little girl.

I did enjoy Reincarnated as a Sword as it was blue cats and other beast people oppressing the black cats and not so much humans just looking down on beast people. Felt less contrived that way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Only a cat girl can call another cat girl cat girl

So if I call a cat girl a cat girl I am a cat girl?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Smoke a couple more Average Abilities and you can be everything you want ;)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fran discrimination!

The 1st Fran get discriminated against because he is a Grey Preist.

The 2nd Fran get discriminated against because she is a Black Cat.

More protections for Frans!

I will also take the 3rd easiest prejudice, ~~Being poor~~ Being a young female adventurer. Everyone is either looking down on them as weak and not being fit to be an adventurer or trying to protect them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And even though all people of class know that the best Fran is a Sky-Pirate bunny girl with the second hottest voice in history.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

best Fran is a Sky-Pirate bunny girl with the second hottest voice in history

I’m going to need a source so I can update my list of Frans

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I assume this is in reference to Fran from Final Fantasy XII. I have started that game at least half a dozen times, but only ever made it like halfway through before burning out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Indeed. The frannest of Frans. A Fran amonst Frans. One Fran to fran them all.

ps.: Yeah, I was never able to finish the game either. I just can't seem to connect with the characters like I did in other Final Fantasy titles. Fran is the only character that I would mind losing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The one I see most often is between Nobles and Commoners. The most egregious examples will even have the commoner (or in some cases, lesser noble) getting ostracized even as they perform deeds of amazing skill. Despite their obvious talents, people will still dismiss them as a lowly commoner, filthy peasant, "Backwater Barons" or "Country Bumpkin". It happens so often it loses meaning.

Worse is when status is used as a writing shortcut. If it's the MC with poor status, then you want to support him. If it's the Villain with too much status, then you want to despise him. It's often used as a lazy writing crutch.

However that doesn't mean status can't be done well. Trapped in a Dating Sim I think did this pretty well, with Leon getting recognition for his achievements and gaining status, much to his chagrin. The Villainess is a SS+ Rank Adventurer also parodies the usual status tropes in its humor. And of course, Ascendence of a Bookworm uses status as a major plot device while diving deep into its society's machinations.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, nobles/commoners is the other easy answer. Too often nobles are depicted as seeing no worth in commoners at all. I prefer the Bookworm/Wild Game approach where they want commoners to obey blindly but are ultimately aware that they are dependent on their commoners.