this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1249 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

11915 readers
141 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I haven't seen someone with so punchable face

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I guess it’s a good thing I make my own coffee at home. Bonus! It doesn’t taste like burnt bean water!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Had to get the money from somewhere. Just like Trump. Fire a bunch of workers for the tax cut payments to billionaires. Like clockwork.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean he has been rewarded for making the line go up. Part of making the line go up is reducing overheads. So he is being directly rewarded for actions like firing 1000+ employees. So is it a surprise?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Continue to boycott starbucks. There are many alternatives just as good and even better.

And if you really want to take things to the next step, making your own coffee at home from freshly roasted beans is soooo worth it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (17 children)

I don't know why people think large companies aren't allowed to get rid of people when they want to? And especially Starbucks, it's shit-work, not a 20y long career maker.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (7 children)

To the company it is "an adjustment." To those people, it can be a devastating loss of healthcare, of the money they use to pay for food and shelter, and even an identity crisis. Starbucks has all sorts of positions, ranging from seasonal part time employees, to store management that gets paid pretty well, to corporate employees that presumed they were in 20y career trajectories. Every single one of them deserves better than losing their job just to pay for a big bonus for one guy.

It's not about whether they are allowed or not. It's that actions should have consequences but the modern corporate structure has so divorced leadership from the consequence of their actions that this is normal. Let me rephrase: Hurting people to pump your personal wealth is not just normal, it's expected. That's sick.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

It's not like individual locations determined they're overstaffed or something. The CEO is just blanket firing people because it makes some numbers look more gooder on some spreadsheet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›