this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
1528 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

16129 readers
1340 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the piece — titled "Can You Fool a Self Driving Car?" — Rober found that a Tesla car on Autopilot was fooled by a Wile E. Coyote-style wall painted to look like the road ahead of it, with the electric vehicle plowing right through it instead of stopping.

The footage was damning enough, with slow-motion clips showing the car not only crashing through the styrofoam wall but also a mannequin of a child. The Tesla was also fooled by simulated rain and fog.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (5 children)

inb4 musk bricks his car remotely

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

E. Lon Musk. Supah. Geenius.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I can’t wait for all this brand loyalty and fan people culture to end. Why is this even a thing? Like talking about box office results, companies financials and stocks…. If you’re not an investor of theirs, just stop. It sounds like you’re working for free for them.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (18 children)

What would definitely help with the discussion is if Mark Rober the scientist left a fucking crumb of scientific approach in his video. He didn’t really explain how he was testing it just slam car into things for views. This and a collaboration with a company that makes lidar made the video open to every possible criticism and it’s a shame.

Discovery channel level of dumbed down „science”.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Of course it disengages self driving modes before an impact. Why would they want to be liable for absolutely anything?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Of course they are, they're cultists. The Elon boot licker and MAGA Venn diagram is a circle.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The bar set for self-driving cars: Can it recognize and respond correctly to a deliberate optical illusion?

The bar set for humans: https://youtu.be/ks11nuGGupI

For the record, I do want the bar for self-driving safety to be high. I also want human drivers to be better... Because even not-entirely-safe self-driving cars may still be safer than humans at a certain point.

Also, fuck Tesla.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I mean it also plowed through a kid because it was foggy, then rainy. The wall was just one of the tests the tesla failed.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›