riodoro1

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Was he friends with the boy in striped pajamas?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Cringe. Embarrassment. Pathetic. Hell, I don’t think there is a word for this piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago

Imagine cybertrucks with fucking roofing screws all over the panels. Mandatory rust spots running from under them.

Gluing panels really is the normal now, it’s just most car manufacturers use adhesives that don’t fucking degrade in a couple of months.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago

I don’t think we would be able to handle this many „good morning” gifs…

… and scam calls

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago

I wonder how they check if the fix is needed. Are they yanking the panels or just dismissing anyone who comes in without a panel half unglued? What a mess.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

It’s just if you pay more you get more of his body.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

That’s the neat part. You don’t.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He made an elaborate test track specifically to make interesting observations.

He set up dozens of cameras to record interesting observations from multiple angles.

He collected footage of interesting phenomena he observed as they were happening in his elaborate test environment.

He then cut the footage up so much it’s impossible for us to say exactly what really happened.

If he went to all this trouble, and then made claims based on his experiment would it really hurt the video to explain the testing process a little bit more?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I want to see more of these experiments in the future. But Marks video is pretty much a commercial for the Lidar manufacturer. And commercials shouldn't be trusted.

This. If the video presented more facts and wasn’t paid for by competition it would be trustworthy. Otherwise it’s just clickbait (very effective judging by the fact we’re discussing it).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Did he enable the autopilot? When? What his inputs to the car were? Is if fsd? What car is that?

You can make every car hit a wall, that is the obvious part, but by claiming (truthfully, I have no doubt) that the car hit it on its own I would like to know what made it do it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Were is a robust description of the experiment? Or am I supposed to look frame by frame at the screen in the car to deduce the testing conditions?

All he had to do was tell us clearly what is enabled on each car and what his inputs are. That would solve all the tesla fanbois comments about him cheating. Maybe he didn’t for „engagement”.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I fucking hate tesla and elon musk. Also I fucking hate people calling unverifiable shit science

 
 
161
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›