this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68991 readers
3563 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new AI weather prediction system, Aardvark Weather, can deliver accurate forecasts tens of times faster and using thousands of times less computing power than current AI and physics-based forecasting systems, according to research published today (Thursday 20 March) in Nature.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_A@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

2025 Mar 20
(...) Aardvark has been developed by researchers from the University of Cambridge (UK) (...)

So it is safe from USA's collapse in science.

(...) This fully AI driven approach means that predictions are now achievable in minutes on a desktop computer. (...)

a.i. is now so far from "autocomplete"

[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

PARTS of AI have been far from auto-corrupt for years. This autocomplete and LLM stuff is far newer.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Specialized A.I. (like Alphafold from Deepmind) is amazing. I mostly just think consumer-level generative A.I. that tries to do everything will probably suck for awhile.

Which I guess is basically like human intelligence if that’s how you’re measuring it. I can go to any bar and find someone confidently wrong 60% of the time. And you can win a Nobel Prize and not really know how to invest the award money competently.