this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
60 points (95.5% liked)

politics

22674 readers
3282 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Republicans are so impressed by the cartoonish nature of his crimes; dude accepted literal gold bars. Clearly they see him as one of their own.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Republicans are so impressed by the cartoonish nature of his crimes

He's giving former Rep. William Jefferson a run for his money.

(No pun intended.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Tsk tsk tsk. Should have intended it. Always intend the pun or at least welcome it after the fact! 😁

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Honorary Republican

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 years ago

The party of George Santos is ok with criminals doing crime?

You don’t say.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They want him to switch parties.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Won't happen. But Republicans do know it's free political capital to support him. Especially with Trump mired it legal trouble. It's not like NJ is going to elect a Republican anytime soon, and Phil Murphy is never going to appoint a Republican to replace him.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Won’t happen.

Yeah, heard that about Sinema, too.

EDIT: Evidently still hearing it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Sinema didn't switch parties. Switching parties would require joining the Republican party for it to matter in the Senate. Sinema switched to independent (no party) and is still caucusing with the Democratic party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

She's literally telling prospective donors that, should she run for re-election, she'd appeal to Republican voters more than Dem ones.

She's a Republican in all but name and, with how much of a corrupt hypocrite she is, she'll fit right in once she makes it official.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It’s not like NJ is going to elect a Republican anytime soon

New Jersey has 12 members in the House of Representatives, and three of them are Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Yes, but a Senate seat requires more than the support of 25% of the population.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

...for Senate. A Republican is not going to win a US Senate seat in NJ anytime soon.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Republicans: AHA! You keep accusing us of corruption but look at your guy here!

Democrats: oh shit, you're actually right. Lock him up!

Republicans: wait no

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

How unlikely is it really that members of a massively corrupt party is supporting a corrupt senator? Even though they're 'enemies', they're still on the same side of milking whatever grift they can while in office.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

Party of law and order!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tom Cotton, Marco Rubio and JD Vance being on your side is a REALLY bad look! I'm not saying guilt by association is a legitimate thing but..

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

I'm not saying guilt by association is a legitimate thing but..

I'll say it.
If there's 3 Nazis and 1 non-nazi eating lunch together, there's 4 Nazis sitting at that table.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Indeed. 🤔

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

We don't really live if a world that's this ridiculous?

Do we?

Do we?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

What’s the opposite of ‘unlikely’?

Wtf is wrong with axios? Nevermind. Forget it. Moving on.