Damn, kernal level anti cheat on linux? Not good :(
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
45 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
9593 readers
19 users here now
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Where do it say that?
eBPF allows for programs to run in the kernel level. This could potentially be used to make kernal level anti cheats.
Cause Microsoft's history with security has been stellar so far.
Lol and Microsoft just caused a global outage with this kind of thing (Crowdstrike)
I'm too dumb to understand what this is. Can someone give me an ELI5? thanks.
Based on my findings, I think it's a debugging and inspecting library for machine learning classifiers.
no, ELI5 means explain like I'm five. It means to dumb something down so people like me can comprehend.
Oh. xD I've never seen that abbreviation before.
No, this has nothing to do with machine learning.
eBPF is a technology that allows you to modify how a system works in a very deep way, while also being very fast. This is neat, but also opens new attack vectors. Signature verification helps you ensure that you're only loading eBPF programs that you trust.
Theoretically at least.
I get it. Misinterpreted the question when I saw "ELI5."
Oh lol, sorry!
No worries. xD
Yea they have to ban the contributor who proposed this.
Only situation where I'd consider including this in a kernel is for use on a gaming platform where it could enable kernel based anti-cheats and thus be attractive to game developers that would otherwise avoid Linux.