this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
514 points (100.0% liked)

Wikipedia

2561 readers
127 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

the devil works fast, but wikipedia writers work faster.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 112 points 4 days ago (1 children)

πŸ‘ŠπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ”₯

(We’re destroying America with our bare hands. The fires are incidental)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not: Fist-bump about the burning flag?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

fisting the flag’s ring of fire

[–] [email protected] 76 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

American Conservatives in 2015: "Wikileaks is the greatest threat to domestic security! They'll destroy our reputation at home and threaten the safety of our brave men and women fighting abroad! Edward Snowden and Julian Assange and Reality Winner should be executed for high treason!"

American Conservatives in 2025: "Actually, it is incredibly cool to post Collateral Murder videos to the public group chat."

[–] [email protected] 68 points 4 days ago

What a pathetic, limped dicked circlejerk. "Look Europe, we're destabilizing the Middle East so that we can bring down oil prices for us, why aren't you guys gargling our cum?". Fuck those morons and fuck whoever voted for them.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

53 people were killed.

None of the right ones though.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

Did you mean: πŸ‘ŠπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ”₯

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago

These text messages are super cringe and so unprofessional.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

This is "proud boys"-level OPSEC πŸ™„

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If this were pitched as an SNL skit it would have been thrown out of the writers room for being too unbelievable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Fiction has to seem plausible, rational even. Though, reality is anything but.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

It's interesting to see that these morons have bought into their own bullshit. The hypothetically smarter GOP politicians at least know that they're disingenuous bastards. These idiot sticks are actually this stupid.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The question is: Can the US government actually do something about this? The journalist had been invited, and probably no-one had reiterated to the group that the contents are top secret.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago

They are supposed to have rigorous, thorough training about what types of channels are considered secure and legal, and which types of communications are secret, top secret, confidential, etc.

Discussing war plans is top secret and if the highest ranking members of our military don't understand that, we are all fucked. The thing is, they do know that, but they are obviously choosing to communicate on Signal so that all of their communications are off the record and undiscoverable, which is another primary reason that what they are doing is illegal and immoral.

[–] radiohead37 17 points 4 days ago

What a joke

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (5 children)

How is it possible that it took less than a day to add this, but when I add articles it takes months?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Once you hit a certain threshold of account age/edit count, you don't have to go through the draft submission process, you can just add an article to mainspace. That said, unless you know what you're doing with writing an article, it'll probably get moved back to draftspace.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Thank you for a proper explanation πŸ™

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Its highly topical, so it could have been prioritised.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Notability?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I think you know why