this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
788 points (100.0% liked)

196

5341 readers
24 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedditRefugee69 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Anyone who thinks this is an oxymoronic stance hasn't bothered to understand the argument and shouldn't be entering the ring to argue against them.

If a cis man is strength/endurance/physical capability X, a cis woman is X-1, and a trans woman is X-0.5, there's no contradiction here.

They would still have an unfair advantage in women's sports and still be less capable of physical feats compared to cis men.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She's the only one in that group I wouldn't want to get into fight with.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›