This sounds interesting...
But I really hate the term "populism". It's most often either a slur for progressivism or a euphemism for fascism. And it primarily serves to conflate the two. After all, who are the biggest "populists" in USA? Bernie and Trump. Any useful meaning has been completely obscured. That's how hegemony maintains order. And given the choice, hegemony will choose fascism every time.
Populist movements frequently invoke religious and gendered narratives to define national identity, mobilize support, and justify exclusionary policies.
How is this "populist"? This article is clearly using "populism" as a euphemism for fascism. That's just caving to the hegemonic narrative and indirectly serving fascism. Just call a spade a spade. Call fascism fascism.
Alot has been said/written about this: https://citationsneeded.libsyn.com/episode-42-populism-the-medias-favorite-catch-all-smear-for-the-left