this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

2836 readers
94 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably easier to switch out for debugging or to flash a SSD from a PC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Surely a M.2 to USB adapter would be better for that use case?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but that adapter ist just a PCB, I'd assume a M.2 to USB Adapter is mofe complicated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You still need a microSD to USB adapter if you want to use it with a PC that doesn't have a microSD slot (which I'm sure is like 99% of PCs).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How many laptops don't have an SD Card slot?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

In my experience, most modern laptops don't include one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Appart from what the article mentioned, cards corrupt way too much on raspberry pis and similar devices compared to usb or ssd storage for example. This gives an easy option to replace them on some embedded device that you might not have full control over.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

how has microSD not died yet

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No real alternatives in that form factor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The form factor is kind of pointless though, I can think of maybe two devices I own where a full sized sd card wouldn't fit and be more convenient

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Smartphones can't fit a regular sized SD slot, so microSD is the default (if a smartphone devices even supports memory cards).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean I think mine could, but even if it couldn't I would have no problem with it being the thickness of like a Palm m505 which easily fits a full sized card on a pocket sized device

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

I am just saying how things are. I am not particularly obsessed about thickness and I have a phone which supports microSD (which is not that common these days).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There are UFS cards. They aren't as fast as SD Express cards, but 1200 MB/s is still plenty fast for a phone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why would anybody adopt a newer standard with no backwards compatibility and slower speeds?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What could even warrant "high speeds" from a damned phone? I can't think of a single thing that would tax an SD card that I'd be doing on a phone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

video recording/editing (some phones can record 4k at high frame rates) , gaming, general responsiveness. I know that we as tech (and especially linux) people don't really understand that but a lot of people are using their phones for a whole load of things now and especially with things now. Also the argument why you would choose UFS would be higher speeds. The real argument for MicroSD Express is backwards compatibility.

Also also I'm looking forwards to being able to run SBC from a MicroSD Express card so it's at least somewhat faster.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They are still a lot faster than normal SD cards. I've never seen any phone that works with SD Express cards, but there were a few that worked with UFS cards.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

If you are a phone manufacturer you can either choose MicroSD cards which are the most common and the cheapest, MicroSD Express Cards which are more expensive but faster and backwards compatible or UFS which nobody has ever heard of.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Is there any advantage to doing this aside from just maybe getting extra storage if you have an M.2 lying around? I thought their whole thing was that they are directly on the bus, which makes them hella fast. 🤨