this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
138 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72472 readers
2647 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A promising start, but a thousand transistors at 25 kilohertz puts it where silicon tech was 60 years ago, so they've a long, long way to go.

If it scales, they can use modern tech and know-how to accelerate their progress and they can get funding, maybe this will be viable in a decade or so.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A promising start, but a thousand transistors at 25 kilohertz puts it where silicon tech was 60 years ago, so they’ve a long, long way to go.

If you're talking about the desire to replace today's modern CPUs, sure. However, in the world of electronics there are lots and lots of support electronics and ICs that run way slower than 25kHz. All of this assumes the technology can scale for cost effective manufacturing yields at this current speed. If its both expensive AND slow, it will have far fewer use cases.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

The article seems to imply that the intention is to replace silicon entirely, but agreed, there might be niches where it can replace silicon even if full replacement might be unrealistic.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I was thinking more about the availability of "molybdenum disulfide and tungsten diselenide" opposed to silicon, they don't sound exactly like Home Depot stuff.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

CPUs are not made in a home depot.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Hah, maybe not where you live.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Fair point. From what I can tell, refined tungsten is actually an order of magnitude cheaper(!) than refined silicon, but molybdenum is over two orders or magnitude more expensive. ~300USD per ton, ~2000USD per ton and ~60000USD per ton respectively.

I assume that if this got up to scale industrially, savings could be made by recycling high purity molybdenum waste, but yes, it's not going to be cheap.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Modern transistors aren't just silicon though. The silicon is doped with various materials, presumably gallium, boron, arsenic, phosphorus, and cobalt, among other elements.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doping_%28semiconductor%29

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But material costs don't matter much in computer pricing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly… the price of these new materials/CPUs isn’t in the amount of “exotic” elements, which is barely measurable on a per-unit basis, but in the production.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I feel like I'd drop it, and it would crack in half.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

They say it's 2D so I would end up setting it somewhere and lose it because I can only see the sides it doesn't actually possess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Linus? That you?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This conceptual illustration of a computer based on 2D molecules displays an actual scanning electron microscope image

Sooo ... is it a conceptual illustration, or an actual SEM image?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Pretty sure the illustration here is just being used to demonstrate what's taking place visually for the reader!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

The 'laptop' is s conceptual illustration. The image shown on the laptop screen is an actual SEM image.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That's very cool, but does anyone else think the title image is AI generated? Neither image nor caption seem to sit right, nor fit together.

Is the 'caption' actually (derived from) a prompt?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

They just keep making phones thinner and thinner

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sophons when?