I think one problem this gets into rhetorically is that people think about "I live here" in terms of demographics in the area of Palestine - American Christians who might be uncritically sympathetic or loyal to Israel might think in terms of Biblical history or when Jews lived there a long time ago, and then they can throw their hands in the air and say it's a complicated history, blah blah blah
Like, OK - that might have a kernel of truth:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_Palestine_(region)
Studies of Palestine's demographic changes over the millennia have shown that a Jewish majority in the first century AD had changed to a Christian majority by the 3rd century AD,[4] and later to a Muslim majority, which is thought to have existed in Mandatory Palestine (1920-1948) since at least the 12th century AD, during which the total shift to Arabic language was completed.[5]
But this misses the point entirely - we aren't saying that somehow only Jews or only Muslims have the original and exclusive right to the land we call Palestine - instead what is important is that Israel is a de facto and de jure recent and illegal invasion and occupation of that land:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_the_Israeli_occupation_of_Palestine
Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories, which has continued since 1967 and is the longest military occupation in modern history,[1] has become illegal under international law. This illegality encompasses the West Bank, including Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem, as well as the blockaded Gaza Strip, which remains to be considered occupied under international law despite the 2005 Israeli disengagement. Israel's policies and practices in the occupied West Bank, including the construction and expansion of Israeli settlements, have amounted to de facto annexation that is illegal under international law.
Framing this as about Jews and Muslims loses the relevant point which is that this is about the illegal and immoral actions of a nation-state.