this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

5092 readers
244 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A UK council has spent over £500,000 to house a vulnerable 10-year-old boy in an illegal children’s home for four months, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ) can reveal.

Isle of Wight council has been charged £29,000 per week for the placement in a semi-detached house leased by the local authority, at which the boy was the only resident. The home is not registered with Ofsted, the education and care watchdog, which makes operating it a criminal offence.

Remarking on the cost to the public purse, a judge said: “You could send him to Disney[land] Paris for a month and save some money.”

At a high court hearing last month, Mr Justice Keehan called the standard of care at the home “wholly inadequate” after hearing allegations of staff’s frequent use of restraint and the boy’s social isolation.

Social workers took the boy into care last year. He had been traumatised by witnessing domestic violence and deemed beyond parental control, and has since been placed in a series of illegal children’s homes.

The hearing concerned the council’s application to renew permission for staff to closely supervise the boy and restrain him if necessary, known as a Deprivation of Liberty (DoL) order. The use of DoL orders for children as young as 10 is rare.

The boy’s experiences, laid bare in the legal proceedings, highlight the failure of the social care system to provide for vulnerable children requiring high levels of supervision.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

£29 a week would be remarkable! The figure is actually £29,000 which is equally remarkable but in a different way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

So what, use mechanical restraint instead?