this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
424 points (100.0% liked)

science

19899 readers
425 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The researchers found an average of around 100 microplastic particles per liter in glass bottles of soft drinks, lemonade, iced tea and beer. That was five to 50 times higher than the rate detected in plastic bottles or metal cans.

"We expected the opposite result," Ph.D. student Iseline Chaib, who conducted the research, told AFP.

"We then noticed that in the glass, the particles emerging from the samples were the same shape, color and polymer composition—so therefore the same plastic—as the paint on the outside of the caps that seal the glass bottles," she said.

The paint on the caps also had "tiny scratches, invisible to the naked eye, probably due to friction between the caps when there were stored," the agency said in a statement.

This could then "release particles onto the surface of the caps," it added.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I find this article confusing. Can someone explain it in a simple language as if I am stupid or sth

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Bottle caps are stored in big bags of some sort before being placed on bottles.

They have sharp edges and they scratch each other's paint as they shift around in the bags.

The scratching produces a fine dust of plastic/paint particles. The dust covers all sides of the bottle caps in the bags.

The caps are placed on the bottles. The dust goes into the liquid inside the bottle. People drink it.

[–] [email protected] 186 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So nothing coupled to the glass but rather the cap having a extra plastic layer on the wet side.

[–] [email protected] 127 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Sounds like we found the issue, now it's just a matter of producers improving the caps

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only if it doesn’t cut it to record profits

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah ill just spend $50 to have a Congress member introduce a bill to make regulating microplastics illegal

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Signtist 20 points 1 week ago

Ha! Good one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, the paint on the outside.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes. So many people are misunderstanding this article... The microplastics are on the inside, in the drink, and they are bits of the paint from the exterior of bottle caps that stuck to the inside of other caps when the caps were all jumbled together in big bags before they were placed on the bottles.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

That would be far more intuitive, but it's not that - it's the painted logo on the outside.

[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In a bizarre twist, plastic bottles have been found to contain alarming levels of microglass.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yea it's coarse and everywhere

https://youtu.be/2tLf1JO5bvE

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Step 1: Invent plastic bottles

Step 2: Pocket the cash

Step 3: Things got bad? Outsource the clean-up to the end user in the form of recycling

Step 4: Increase prices to account for recycling

Step 5: Laugh as the idiots actually recycle your shit

Step 6: Throw the whole shebang in the ocean or in landfills

Step 7: Pocket some more cash

Step 8: Pat yourself on your shoulder. You've done some capitalism.

[–] bollybing 39 points 1 week ago

You forgot the step where they invent a logo that looks almost the same as the recyclable logo and stick it on all plastics but it doesnt mean its recyclable but instead just says what kind of plastic it is.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As someone in a cork industry, you really don't want that.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What is this teasing? Elaborate.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Care to expand on why? I've had corks dissolve and break if I didn't finish the drink quickly enough, just on liquor bottles that went unused for a year or so. Any other reason?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Slightly educated guess. True organic cork is produced by cutting the bark off specific trees. There are limited climates it grows. I would guess the scale with which we produce bottled drinks would require significantly more trees and labor that we currently have. And thus cork prices would skyrocket.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Title seems misleading.

As the micro plastics were found on the paint outside the bottle cap. It seems complicate that that ended on the drink itself. Unless you are licking the bottle cap it doesn't seem that relevant.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

No, the microplastics were found in the content of the bottles. The cap thing is where they come from. As a reply to you explained, the microplastic from the top of a cap is scratched by another cap and ends up on the bottom of yet another cap.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The paint on the caps also had "tiny scratches, invisible to the naked eye, probably due to friction between the caps when there were stored," the agency said in a statement.

This could then "release particles onto the surface of the caps," it added.

Paint scratches off the outside, then sticks to the inside and makes it into the drink.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Wait...we not licking bottle caps anymore?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Man on the surface this reeks of inside payoffs. I guess the technicality is plastic caps on glass bottles?? Which seems weird and nothing I've ever seen. Unless they're referencing the seal on the inside of some metal caps on glass bottles? Either way, seems suspect. I'd assume that overall drinking from glass is safer, as with plastic on any timeline you're dealing with the plastic breaking down and leaching chemicals and micro plastics into the liquid, which wouldn't be an issue with glass.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not plastic caps, plastic paint. The printing on bottlecaps is a polymer and it gets scuffed.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Odd. I would have thought that the paint, being on the exterior, wouldn't leak into the beverage contained inside the glass.

But apparently, they found that blowing air over the caps reduced the amount of detected contamination by 60 per cent. So it seems like an easy fix that manufacturers can implement inexpensively (literally just an electric fan)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Or just not paint the caps, at least not with plastic.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

The paint itself on the outside of the bottle cap. The ultra thin layer of (apparently polymer a.k.a. plastic) paint that make the cap not just metal colored.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

Just pour it from the glass bottle to the plastic bottle. Problem solved

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

For the people in the comments who either won't or seemingly can't read the article: The paint on the top of the caps is plastic-based and before they're put on the bottle they're stored in a big jumbled up pile where the paint chips off and coats the caps in tiny flakes. When the cap gets put on the bottle, the flakes on the bottom of the cap get washed off into your drink. Studies show that washing the caps first dramatically reduces the micro-plastic contamination.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

We just need glass caps then

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Or just unpainted aluminium caps.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When I was a kid they were made from metal

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

When I was a kid they were made from cork.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

In a bizarre twist, glass caps have been found to contain alarming levels of microdrink.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...do plastic bottles not have caps? I'm confused.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (7 children)

their caps are fully plastic, not painted metal. The non-screwtop metal caps need to be bent to release their grip on the bottle. That scrapes the paint off the metal cap.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›