New Jersey Cannabis

Plaintiffs have no constitutional right to use marijuana

That's a strange thing for the judge to dismiss the case over when it's about the constitutional right to bear arms and not marijuana. There's a lot of things that we don't have an enumerated right for that this logic opens up for banning. Can we ban all pickup truck owners from owning guns? They should've bought a sedan if they wanted to be allowed to buy a gun.

Now is when the Constitution must be followed. Rules that bind, etc etc.