this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
1729 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

70081 readers
3020 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you miss phones with replaceable batteries? By 2027, you won't anymore because, by law, almost every smartphone will have them again.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I am curious how Apple will get around that this time. I’m almost sure this will be as funny as the whole story about the USB-C cables

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Simply remove the battery and sell iPhones with magsafe battery pack cases instead?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Super capacitor instead of battery. lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Yurop did it again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

However, there is an exemption for high-performing and durable batteries until 2027. This means devices with high quality batteries that retain over 80% of their capacity after 1000 charge cycles do not need to comply with the removable battery requirement until 2027.

So premium phones like the iPhone would be exempt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have mixed feelings on this. I think there were a few good reasons to move to sealed batteries. In an ideal world you could give consumers choices between the various trade-offs and offer multiple models or variants.

But of course that will never happen because non-replaceable batteries present a far better business case. If they were forced to offer options, the manufacturers would deliberately make the user-replaceable models far shittier and then complain to the regulators that they were unpopular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Manufacturers aren't going to make a different model for the rest of the world. It's much cheaper to just make one model.

A good example is Tesla models 75D and 100D - they both have the exact same battery pack but the 75D is electronically limited so that the range is less than on 100D so it's cheaper tho it's the same car.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

They would just "underdevelop" other areas to make their phone "breakable" or "prone to accidents". I am not that hyped because of that.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›