this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
53 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13052 readers
1 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One isn't much better than the other lol

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cybrpwca@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"How dare you accuse me of not writing that article. I didn't even write it!"

[–] Goodman@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just love how retraction watch just doesn't hold back with statements like this

Loffroy also toned down the offense, saying he wouldn’t care if others had plagiarized his work.

They also just posted his picture on the top of the article.

[–] brie@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plagiarism is misrepresenting someone elses' work as your own, so wouldn't having a ghostwriter write "your" article still be plagiarism regardless?

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not quite what I was taught. It is possible to self-plagiarise, plagiarism only needs to be reproduction of a work with the claim it is your own original work.

I still think that's a ploy by journal publishers to prevent losing their exclusive extortion abilities, but that doesn't really make much difference to the end result.

[–] brie@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Self-plagiarism to me is more of a related but separately defined term from "true plagiarism," but defining it based on work rather than author does make a lot of sense.