this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
171 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

68348 readers
6042 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] markr@lemmy.world 95 points 2 years ago (35 children)

Mass transit should be free.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fare evasion is like stealing bread. It's a crime of desperation.

This kind of budgetary indulgence only indicates the MTA doesn't much like the public of the city it serves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe they should start electing people to charge property taxes correctly to those ultra luxury condos.

[–] Crisps@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Local mass transit should be free. It is already really heavily subsidized, often almost entirely subsidized, so it wouldn’t cost as much as you think.

[–] httpjames@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago (6 children)

America won't achieve that with such low tax rates

[–] Rhodin@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Mass transit barely exists in most of America.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Yes. Interestingly US taxes aren't even low if you factor in what you have to pay for directly, compared to what other countries pay though taxes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nobug404@geddit.social 7 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Mass transit cannot be free.

It should however be without toll. It can quite reasonably be funded with tax.

But free? No. Someone somewhere has to pay for the infrastructure and operations.

[–] markr@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

Free to use, funded by taxes. Like how healthcare should work.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

This seems like needless nitpicking. The end result is the same, it's still free at the point of use.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Free as in free to use. Just like roads.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I'm curious how much of the budget is covered by fares. I think here in Europe it tends to be roughly 50%. But the trains are much better than NYC and the fares are cheaper.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The title should be "NYC wastes money on software that doesn't work rather than reducing fares or eliminating them entirely".

[–] Derproid@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lmfao, I'm pretty sure the idea is that it will return them more money than it costs. You just want free subway rides or something? It's fucking $2.75 to go ANYWHERE.

[–] chanchan@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

what a great use of resources 😒

load more comments