this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
68 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

57 readers
1 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Brave Search users can now search for images and videos without being redirected to Google or Bing, though some advanced search capabilities are still absent.”

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kostel_thecreed@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Brave releases its own privacy-preserving crypto-included image and video search" there, fixed it.

[–] ChiefGhost295@lemmy.one 24 points 2 years ago

They need to make money somehow, and regardless, all the crypto stuff is actually turned off by default, so criticizing Brave for this makes little sense to me.

[–] Thorned_Rose@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think that's just with Brave browser, not Brave Search. At least, I can't find anything related to crypto in Brave Search settings that are there in Brave Browser (I'm using Firefox with Brave Search).

EDIT: With Brave Search (not using the browser), I'm more concerned that the results are still being curated and some results censored. Whereas using something like Kagi, I can see the results are exactly what I would expect to be served, uncensored and uncurated (i.e. how Google and all the rest used to be before they decided they knew better than us what we wanted to search for.)

[–] wagoner@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Thorned_Rose@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

EDIT: I just realised my brain got confused between two conversations I was having at the same time. One was this one - the difference between Brave BROWSER and Brave SEARCH. And another one where I was talking about Duck Duck Go curating search results 🤦🏻‍♀️ Sorry for the confusion!


https://www.pcmag.com/news/duckduckgo-to-down-rank-sites-associated-with-russian-disinformation

Curation of results. Yes, you can argue it's for a good reason. My issue is that they curate results based on ideologies at all. If they intentionally downrank some results based on their own beliefs for one thing, how can we trust them not to do it with other things? They weren't exactly transparent about it either.

I just want a search engine that serves me results based on what I have searched for. I can use my own brain to curate out or downrank results I don't want. I'm not interested in a search engine that thinks it knows what's best for me.

[–] wagoner@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the clarification. I appreciate the risks but I like my search engine to have some standards rather than no filter at all

[–] Melpomene@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Thorned_Rose@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Sorry for confusion, I was having two different conversations going on at the same time and my brain was mixing them up a bit. I was referring to Duck Duck Go curating search results.

That said, Kagi does give me more relevant search results than Brave does. I know Brave Search says it doesn't censor, curate (downrank), etc. And yet, I still find controversial topics lower in the search results of Brave than I do with Kagi. (Not saying I'm siding with any controversial ideas, but rather I use controversial topics to test search engines for curation and censorship.)

Again, sorry for confusion!

[–] sphere_au@reddthat.com 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Brave Search is now frequently beating DDG and Startpage for accuracy of search results. It's like using Google 10 years ago when it was actually good but without the ads, tracking and pestering to "log in". Good stuff.

[–] Fungah@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

DDG, Google, bing, starypage (which uses bing / Google I believe) are all god awful and getting worse by the day.

The only one worth a damn is kagi. And it costs money.

I talked at the idea of paying for a search engine at first but the peace of mind that comes with not being tracked by an out of control hunter seeker dumpster fire is worth it.

[–] Skimmer@lemmy.fmhy.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Kagi is easily the greatest search engine I've ever used, no exaggeration, the results are just consistently so good, I love all of its features too, like the tracker detection and details on results. I just wish it was cheaper, its really hard for me to justify paying $10 a month for a search engine. If it was cheaper, I'd buy it in a heart beat. Just been using Brave Search in combination with DDG for the time being. Brave Search's CAPTCHAs just drive me nuts, been running into them a lot lately for some reason, that's my biggest problem with it, especially how they require WASM to be enabled every time which is a security risk too.

[–] HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

Brave has been great. There have been barely any times where I had to switch to Google because I didn't find something, whereas this happened with DDG quite regularly. DDG has one upside with the bang operators making searching something very easy via other search engines

[–] thecam@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I find the image search accuray not that good but in time I know it will beat DDG and Startpage/Google

[–] jacktherippah@lemdro.id 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Say what you want about Brave as a company, their browser and search engine products are pretty damn good.

[–] LambLeeg@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, usually that happens when Americans come it. They freaking love to add politics to anything. Since they are mostly leftist, they bash anything they don't like out of the sake of doing so. Brave is great, I have been using its search engine from the beginning and the browser when Blink engine is enforced, and I cannot use Firefox.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 9 points 2 years ago

US politics is considered quite conservative, actually. The Democratic Party certainly isn't "leftist" by anything other than warped American standards.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago

First time hearing America described as mostly leftists.

[–] MediaActivist@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not interested in any company that welcomes Brendan Eich as CEO.

[–] gunnm@monero.town 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lol you should learn a little about Lemmy developers.

[–] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 2 years ago

I'm absolutely shocked that someone with an account on a crypto-themed instance is equivocating being a communist and egregious homophobia. Lmao.

[–] spiderman@ani.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I wonder who co-founded Mozilla...

[–] MediaActivist@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

My point exactly.

[–] Melpomene@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In fairness to Brave, Google has been scaling back search features too, over time. Do you remember when it would allow you to search a date range? Melpomene Farms remembers.

[–] Riker_Maneuver@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What is the reason for removing search functionality? Is it really just to make it harder to find what people want and potentially be served more ads? Hopefully site:whateverbutprobablyreddit.com never goes on the chopping block.

[–] glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

People will search for something, won't see it below a bunch of ads, then go back and make a more specific search so they can be served more ads.

How about Google SearchWiki? Or even just starring results?

This is from an era when Google hosted their blog on a Blogspot subdomain.

[–] Mohamad20ZX@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hey aren't these features removed from the beta than they added them back

[–] privacyfalcon9899@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

No, it was proxying from bing at first place. Then they removed it.

[–] Im28xwa@lemdro.id 1 points 2 years ago

And I was wondering where did the previous image and video search functionality go! Anyway good news nonetheless