this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
208 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

18774 readers
20 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I almost forgot Apollo… 🥹

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Voyager is such a great replacement ☺️ but yea, was a very sad end for Apollo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit killed third party apps like seven months ago.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

oh i tought it updated for lemmy too, bummer

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I’m currently reading your comment on Voyager, which is the Lemmy version of Apollo lol.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It wasn't publicly spoken about much from what I understand, but headsets were sent to some select developers within a month or so of the announcement. A buddy of mine was working at a company that is basically totally AR/MR focused and they had around 3 units for development purposes. Disney had to have had them even sooner because they were demoing Disney stuff right at the announcement.

I wouldn't be totally surprised if the Apollo guy was one of them. He's an ex Apple employee and Apollo got called out or at least shown in Apple keynotes multiple times before it shut down.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Under the "Can I give feedback?" section, he mentions that he only used the simulator in Xcode for developing this. So sadly he wasn't one of the few people with a development unit. That makes how quickly he's done this even more impressive!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Also it’s a css JavaScript skin over the actual YouTube website with some video player integration.

It’s not like the whole interface is from the ground up.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I follow Christian on mastodon. He didn’t have one when he made the app, he was using the emulator.

He is currently on a Canada -> USA road trip to get a vision pro

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the article (right under "Can I give feedback"):

I’ve only been able to develop this in the simulator, which obviously has its limitations, so once I get my hands on a device this Friday I’ll probably have a lot of thoughts on things I want to improve as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Does it block ads? It doesn’t, I don’t think Google would like that, but if you have YouTube Premium you won’t see ads, just like the website. Honestly, YouTube Premium is like one of the most essential subscriptions for me, it’s so handy to never worry about ads and it’s pretty cool in that it also supports the creators substantially more than if you watched ads. So I dunno, if you can afford an expensive Apple Vision Pro, I’d really consider treating yourself to YouTube Premium!

O no,… they took him.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh grow up.

YouTube sucks balls, but people still want it and the dev, who made Apollo and is one of the best app makers out there, did what they could to make YT available quickly.

So now you’re shitting on him personally because he didn’t fulfill your crusade. Get a life or learn to program and get off your ass and do it yourself.

Jesus, people.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

You need to simmer down.

Your point is correct, but it's fair to comment on the fact a previously vocal free software/no subscription dev is following a different model with this project. He was quite vocal about the reddit API changes, and many folks heard of him during that situation.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (13 children)

That's not anywhere close to anything he said.

He was perfectly happy to pay reasonable pricing for API access or to pass through ads if Reddit included them as part of the API.

His issue was that Reddit's pricing was obscenely more than they generate per user, functionally made it impossible for developers to pass the costs on to the users even if they wanted to, dropped it on him with minimal warning after very recent statements that they had every intention of leaving API access alone, and then repeatedly fucking publicly lied about him when he had the audacity to tell his paying customers what was going on in the very near future.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

He was not against paying for the API. The prices Reddit asked for were just insane and he could not have continued Apollo with an optional subscription. Youtube Premium is also optional. The fact that Apollo did not show ads was Reddits „fault“.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The ads/subscription here were pre-existing and, depending on who you ask, are fairly good and necessary to make YouTube not a total loss- I can’t claim to know everything Christian believes but I imagine he’s fine with paying reasonable amounts for subscriptions of live services that he actually uses, or paying for the tools to make things.

Also building adblocking into something like this would be a moving target and akin to poking a sleeping bear, which I can understand wanting to avoid.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please calm your tits and take a free trial.

Spaghetti monster, people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

It's not like he can make an ad free version of YouTube and release it on Vision, it would probably get instantly taken down.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Premium is pretty great, to be honest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google’s TOS forbids any apps that block ads. Enhancer for YouTube recently removed it as well (although it has to be on the Play store).

Get yourself a DNS blocker.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

DNS ad blockers don’t work on YouTube :c

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Please help me understand the point of the Vision Pro? It’s not VR. And every app and screenshot I’m seeing looks like “let’s throw this window, that you could normally have on your desktop or TV in your field of view”. Are there any mechanisms to have it interact with your surrounding in an AR type manner? Or does it just overlay flat windows on top of what you’re seeing?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Afaik there are only a handful of actual AR stuff right now:

  • Application windows stay anchored to your environment until you reset them. If you put them on top of your desk, it'll stay there even if you move to your kitchen.
  • When you look at your mac, it'll sometimes pop a button to allow you to initiate virtual display to your mac.
  • When you look down to your bluetooth keyboard, it'll show whatever you type in a floating box complete with suggestions.

Maybe there are more I'm not aware of.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There we go! That’s some stuff that I was missing. Thank you!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Here’s a guided tour of it if you want to learn more

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I want it for the virtual monitor aspect. Especially since I have adhd, I think this would possibly cut down on distractions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It’s AR and VR in whatever mix you want it to be. The little spinny dial at the top controls how much of the real world you see vs how much of a virtual environment you see. The bottom end is full AR, the top end is full VR.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Preparation for the future. If you want an actual VR device get an oculus

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

does google allow stuff like this? i would expect they will try to disable it or simple c&d pretty quickly.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Since a lot of people will come to the comments without reading the article itself:

It is embedding the Youtube video, like a lot of websites and apps do - if you ever watched a youtube video outside of youtube.com or official apps, odds are it is using the same API as that app.

It still shows ads and uses the Youtube website directly for certain parts, but with some custom CSS and JS akin to how browser extensions would work.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You didn’t read the article, did you ?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't even know YT clients were a thing yet (aside usual alternatives ofc 🏴‍☠️).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's not* really a client. The app uses embeds for playback and the regular YouTube website (with css modifications ontop) for browsing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›