this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22655 readers
3652 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

ha, they were not in a private home, they were in the garage of the private home! What a fucking liar! off with his head!

i dont really like this guy, but this article is stupid. FACT check! hahahaha

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

It got you to click. 😕 It probably went into their metrics as an example of "yeah this one's tracking pretty well." That is the sad reality of most ad-supported journalism I think.

Here's the actual special counsel report. I searched it out because I was very curious about that "and disclosed" part of "Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen," but so far I haven't learned all that much.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

well, it is cnn. they're more interested in appeasing fascists these days just in case if fascism takes over, they won't be the ones at the head of the line when they put us in the camps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

"All the stuff that was in my home was in filing cabinets that were either locked or able to be locked.”

Ehhh, I think there's a difference between a locked filing cabinet indoors and a random bankers box in the garage.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

CNN sure is pushing this story.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People on the right think CNN is ultra-lefty. Meanwhile, CNN lets Republican also-rans spout shitty talking points unchallenged in prime time pointless debates.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

and when they do get challenged, "we'll have to leave it there."

cowards.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's just fact checking. What's wrong with that?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

"I'm just asking questions!"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

This is so much worse than saying you'll be "dictator for a day."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy shitting on Biden for Gaza = "YAY!"

Literally any other criticism = DOWNVOTE THE HEATHEN!

It's kinda weird folks.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not a monolith of course, but I think it's safe to say that the majority of the hivemind dislikes the indiscriminate slaughter and starvation of the innocent, but likes the preservation of American democracy enough to see through this week's "reasons why this Democrat fucked up real big-time irrevocably, believe me it's a tragedy, let's strategically not mention the substance of what's at stake in this campaign" talking point

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So it's just lemmy basically wants Biden to win but doesn't know American politics well enough to know that stopping supporting Israel would likely tank Biden's chances in the election?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, because it's super disingenuous to criticize Biden on it like Trump wouldn't be way worse. We know Trump will yank all the funding from Ukraine and hand it over to Isreal. Sure Biden sucks, but like every other conversation on the subject, he's better than the other option so we have to begrudgingly support him. The last time we tried to disagree with someone morally was Hillary and we spent 4 years dealing with Trump. If my options are 1 guy who opposes 1 genocide and 1 guy who supports 2 then I guess I'll pick the guy opposing one. I'd rather have no genocides, but here we are

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, because it's super disingenuous to criticize Biden on it like Trump wouldn't be way worse.

Yeah, this is my basic problem with Lemmy on this. Biden's actions are largely the result of American political realities and trump would be way worse. Dangerously so.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely just because someone else would be worse, doesn't mean you can't criticize the current leader. That's a very slippery slope if you go down that path.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure but that's our point. We can sit here discussing the minutia of Biden and what little things he may or may not be doing correctly, meanwhile Trump supporters hear him say "I'll be a dictator day 1" and get a boner so hard they need to call their doctor. We made this mistake by being balanced about our candidate before and we saw where it got us. I'd like to hear you suggest a realistically better choice for the average American than to support Biden continuing to be milquetoast

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't have an answer for you on that (non-US), but if the plan is to pretend the current leader makes no mistakes because the opposition is worse.. that's not going to be pretty 10 years down the track. Granted, I appreciate that alternative now is also not pretty.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again I understand and agree with you, but I ask: what do you suggest as a realistic alternative?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

My suggestion is there needs to be some serious cultural and political change before America shits the bed and becomes a fucking hot mess. Now whether that is realistic is something completely different.
The fact were in 2024 and half of your country is effectively promoting rape and refusing care for 50% of your population (females) is absolutely wild to me. So I don't know your culture enough to provide a realistic alternative. But coming from a country that sees America as an Ally, I hope the country gets its shit together sooner rather than later.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No, because it's super disingenuous to criticize Biden on it like Trump wouldn't be way worse.

A very "you're with us or against us" mentality

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I won't claim to speak for "Lemmy." It's not a monolith. For myself, I wish the US would stop supporting Israel just like they've done for decades, because Likud is clearly full of bloodthirsty monsters, and whatever bloodthirsty monsters do also exist among Hamas, the IDF is doing most of the killing, and we're actively arming them. Of course that doesn't mean I want the apocalyptic nightmare that would be a second Trump presidency; among other reasons because it would usher in lots and lots more suffering similar to what's currently going on in Gaza.

I think to the extent Lemmy's thinking on it is defined as a single hivemind, they just like being super-leftist which means supporting innocent people who are on the losing end of violent geopolitics, and shitting on corporate candidates which broadly speaking includes Biden, and so that means they're giving Biden hell about Gaza. Which, I won't tell them they're wrong to give him hell. But, if that helps Trump win, they definitely won't be happy with that outcome, and yelling about how it's not their fault definitely won't do them any good when abortions are banned nationwide, Hispanics and trans people are treated like mid-1930s Jews, and their social media is monitored by properly-politically-minded censors backed by punishment of prison. That is the type of best case short-term outcome we could hope for. You may think I'm joking but I am absolutely not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Hur wrote that investigators looked into the possibility that the Afghanistan-related documents found in the box were previously stored in a filing cabinet when Biden lived in a rented home in Virginia before moving out in 2019.

Hur wrote that Biden notebooks containing classified information from his vice presidency were found by investigators in “unlocked drawers in the office and basement den” of the home.

Hur wrote that Biden “should have known” that as a private citizen as of 2017, “he was not permitted to keep handwritten notes about the President’s Daily Brief and other classified information in unlocked drawers in his home.”

For example, Hur wrote, the open box in Biden’s garage contained an Afghanistan-related memo from the National Security Adviser to President Barack Obama in 2009 marked “TOP SECRET/SCI” (Sensitive Compartmented Information).

Hur wrote that experts in the intelligence community said the document contains “highly sensitive information about the military programs of the United States and a foreign government.

The unauthorized disclosure of this information, both today and in 2017 when Mr. Biden was no longer vice president, reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.”


The original article contains 1,317 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Obviously they should have been in cardboard boxes in his bathroom. Silly sleepy joe keeping them in filing cabinets.